SOTAVerified

Few-Shot Image Classification

Few-Shot Image Classification is a computer vision task that involves training machine learning models to classify images into predefined categories using only a few labeled examples of each category (typically ( Image credit: Learning Embedding Adaptation for Few-Shot Learning )

Papers

Recently AddedMost HypedMost ActiveNeeds VerificationMost Verified

Showing 1–10 of 353 papers

TitleStatusHype
ViT-ProtoNet for Few-Shot Image Classification: A Multi-Benchmark EvaluationCode0
Interpretable Few-Shot Image Classification via Prototypical Concept-Guided Mixture of LoRA Experts—0
Provably Improving Generalization of Few-Shot Models with Synthetic Data—0
Simple Semi-supervised Knowledge Distillation from Vision-Language Models via Dual-Head OptimizationCode0
Brain Inspired Adaptive Memory Dual-Net for Few-Shot Image Classification—0
InPK: Infusing Prior Knowledge into Prompt for Vision-Language Models—0
Augmented Conditioning Is Enough For Effective Training Image Generation—0
Geometric Mean Improves Loss For Few-Shot Learning—0
A Cognitive Paradigm Approach to Probe the Perception-Reasoning Interface in VLMs—0
IDEA: Image Description Enhanced CLIP-AdapterCode0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 1 of 36Next →
All datasetsMini-Imagenet 5-way (1-shot)Mini-Imagenet 5-way (5-shot)Tiered ImageNet 5-way (5-shot)Tiered ImageNet 5-way (1-shot)CIFAR-FS 5-way (5-shot)CIFAR-FS 5-way (1-shot)CUB 200 5-way 1-shotCUB 200 5-way 5-shotFC100 5-way (1-shot)FC100 5-way (5-shot)Meta-DatasetOMNIGLOT - 1-Shot, 20-way

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PT+MAP+SF+BPA (transductive)Accuracy89.94—Unverified
2PT+MAP+SF+SOT (transductive)Accuracy89.94—Unverified
3PEMnE-BMS*Accuracy88.44—Unverified
4LST+MAPAccuracy87.79—Unverified
5Illumination AugmentationAccuracy87.73—Unverified
6PT+MAPAccuracy87.69—Unverified
7BAVARDAGEAccuracy87.35—Unverified
8EASY 3xResNet12 (transductive)Accuracy87.16—Unverified
9EASY 2xResNet12 1/√2 (transductive)Accuracy86.99—Unverified
10P>M>F (P=DINO-ViT-base, M=ProtoNet)Accuracy84.3—Unverified