SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Stance Detection

Stance detection is the extraction of a subject's reaction to a claim made by a primary actor. It is a core part of a set of approaches to fake news assessment.

Example:

Source: "Apples are the most delicious fruit in existence"
Reply: "Obviously not, because that is a reuben from Katz's"
Stance: deny

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 61–70 of 343 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
Catch Me If You Can: Deceiving Stance Detection and Geotagging Models to Protect Privacy of Individuals on Twitter	Jul 23, 2022	Stance Detection	—Unverified	0
CU-GWU Perspective at SemEval-2016 Task 6: Ideological Stance Detection in Informal Text	Jun 1, 2016	Sentiment AnalysisStance Detection	—Unverified	0
A Weakly Supervised Propagation Model for Rumor Verification and Stance Detection with Multiple Instance Learning	Apr 6, 2022	Binary ClassificationMultiple Instance Learning	—Unverified	0
A Weakly-Supervised Attention-based Visualization Tool for Assessing Political Affiliation	Aug 5, 2019	Natural Language UnderstandingStance Detection	—Unverified	0
Automatic Stance Detection Using End-to-End Memory Networks	Apr 20, 2018	Stance Detection	—Unverified	0
Automatic detection of stance towards vaccination in online discussion forums	Nov 1, 2017	Binary ClassificationSentiment Analysis	—Unverified	0
A More Advanced Group Polarization Measurement Approach Based on LLM-Based Agents and Graphs	Nov 19, 2024	Stance DetectionZero-Shot Stance Detection	—Unverified	0
Adversarial Domain Adaptation for Stance Detection	Feb 6, 2019	Domain AdaptationFact Checking	—Unverified	0
A Logically Consistent Chain-of-Thought Approach for Stance Detection	Dec 26, 2023	Stance DetectionZero-Shot Stance Detection	—Unverified	0
A Unified Feature Representation for Lexical Connotations	May 31, 2020	Stance Detection	—Unverified	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 7 of 35Next →

All datasets MGTAB RumourEval FNC-1 ARC (AI2 Reasoning Challenge)argmin Dhoroni emergent iac1 ibmcs mtsd Perspectrum poldeb

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	RGT	Acc	87.8	—	Unverified
2	Simple-HGN	Acc	85.3	—	Unverified
3	GCN	Acc	82.4	—	Unverified
4	GAT	Acc	82.2	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	66.58	—	Unverified
2	Kochkina et al. 2017	Accuracy	0.78	—	Unverified
3	Bahuleyan and Vechtomova 2017	Accuracy	0.78	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	83.17	—	Unverified
2	Transition Matrix	F1	77.76	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	64.82	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	62.79	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	BanglaBERT-Dhoroni	Accuracy	0.64	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	82.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	56.97	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	88.06	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	63.96	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	83.11	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	52.76	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	COLA+GPT3.5	Average F1	83.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Boosting	F1	0.87	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	64.71	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	58.72	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	78.61	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	BERT	Average F1	66	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)	Avg F1	0.86	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)	Avg F1	0.84	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	57.47	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	70.98	—	Unverified