SOTAVerified

Topic-Guided Sampling For Data-Efficient Multi-Domain Stance Detection

2023-06-01Code Available0· sign in to hype

Erik Arakelyan, Arnav Arora, Isabelle Augenstein

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Stance Detection is concerned with identifying the attitudes expressed by an author towards a target of interest. This task spans a variety of domains ranging from social media opinion identification to detecting the stance for a legal claim. However, the framing of the task varies within these domains, in terms of the data collection protocol, the label dictionary and the number of available annotations. Furthermore, these stance annotations are significantly imbalanced on a per-topic and inter-topic basis. These make multi-domain stance detection a challenging task, requiring standardization and domain adaptation. To overcome this challenge, we propose Topic Efficient StancE Detection (TESTED), consisting of a topic-guided diversity sampling technique and a contrastive objective that is used for fine-tuning a stance classifier. We evaluate the method on an existing benchmark of 16 datasets with in-domain, i.e. all topics seen and out-of-domain, i.e. unseen topics, experiments. The results show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art with an average of 3.5 F1 points increase in-domain, and is more generalizable with an averaged increase of 10.2 F1 on out-of-domain evaluation while using 10\% of the training data. We show that our sampling technique mitigates both inter- and per-topic class imbalances. Finally, our analysis demonstrates that the contrastive learning objective allows the model a more pronounced segmentation of samples with varying labels.

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
ARC (AI2 Reasoning Challenge)TESTEDF164.82Unverified
argminTESTEDF162.79Unverified
emergentTESTEDF182.1Unverified
FNC-1TESTEDF183.17Unverified
iac1TESTEDF156.97Unverified
ibmcsTESTEDF188.06Unverified
mtsdTESTEDF163.96Unverified
PerspectrumTESTEDF183.11Unverified
poldebTESTEDF152.76Unverified
RumourEvalTESTEDF166.58Unverified
SCDTESTEDF164.71Unverified
SemEval 2019TESTEDF158.72Unverified
SnopesTESTEDF178.61Unverified
VASTTESTEDF157.47Unverified
wtwtTESTEDF170.98Unverified

Reproductions