SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Stance Detection

Stance detection is the extraction of a subject's reaction to a claim made by a primary actor. It is a core part of a set of approaches to fake news assessment.

Example:

Source: "Apples are the most delicious fruit in existence"
Reply: "Obviously not, because that is a reuben from Katz's"
Stance: deny

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 301–310 of 343 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype	Score
Embracing Diversity: A Multi-Perspective Approach with Soft Labels	Mar 1, 2025	DiversityStance Detection	—Unverified	0	0
Stance Detection on Social Media: State of the Art and Trends	Jun 5, 2020	Opinion MiningSentiment Analysis	—Unverified	0	0
Deep Ensemble Learning for News Stance Detection	Sep 13, 2019	Ensemble LearningFact Checking	—Unverified	0	0
DeInStance: Creating and Evaluating a German Corpus for Fine-Grained Inferred Stance Detection	Sep 1, 2021	Stance Detection	—Unverified	0	0
Stance Detection on Social Media with Fine-Tuned Large Language Models	Apr 18, 2024	Few-Shot LearningStance Detection	—Unverified	0	0
Stance Detection on Tweets: An SVM-based Approach	Mar 23, 2018	Sentiment AnalysisStance Detection	—Unverified	0	0
Stance Detection with BERT Embeddings for Credibility Analysis of Information on Social Media	May 21, 2021	Fake News DetectionMisinformation	—Unverified	0	0
Detecting Stance in Tweets And Analyzing its Interaction with Sentiment	Aug 1, 2016	Information RetrievalNatural Language Inference	—Unverified	0	0
What Media Frames Reveal About Stance: A Dataset and Study about Memes in Climate Change Discourse	May 22, 2025	Optical Character Recognition (OCR)Stance Detection	—Unverified	0	0
Active learning for detection of stance components	Dec 1, 2016	Active LearningOpinion Mining	—Unverified	0	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 31 of 35Next →

All datasets MGTAB RumourEval FNC-1 ARC (AI2 Reasoning Challenge)argmin Dhoroni emergent iac1 ibmcs mtsd Perspectrum poldeb

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	RGT	Acc	87.8	—	Unverified
2	Simple-HGN	Acc	85.3	—	Unverified
3	GCN	Acc	82.4	—	Unverified
4	GAT	Acc	82.2	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	66.58	—	Unverified
2	Kochkina et al. 2017	Accuracy	0.78	—	Unverified
3	Bahuleyan and Vechtomova 2017	Accuracy	0.78	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	83.17	—	Unverified
2	Transition Matrix	F1	77.76	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	64.82	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	62.79	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	BanglaBERT-Dhoroni	Accuracy	0.64	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	82.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	56.97	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	88.06	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	63.96	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	83.11	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	52.76	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	COLA+GPT3.5	Average F1	83.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Boosting	F1	0.87	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	64.71	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	58.72	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	78.61	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	BERT	Average F1	66	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)	Avg F1	0.86	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)	Avg F1	0.84	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	57.47	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	70.98	—	Unverified