SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Stance Detection

Stance detection is the extraction of a subject's reaction to a claim made by a primary actor. It is a core part of a set of approaches to fake news assessment.

Example:

Source: "Apples are the most delicious fruit in existence"
Reply: "Obviously not, because that is a reuben from Katz's"
Stance: deny

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 301–310 of 343 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
A Crowdsourcing Approach for Annotating Causal Relation Instances in Wikipedia	Nov 1, 2017	Named Entity Recognition (NER)Question Answering	—Unverified	0
Unsupervised Detection of Argumentative Units though Topic Modeling Techniques	Sep 1, 2017	Argument MiningOpinion Mining	—Unverified	0
Fake news stance detection using stacked ensemble of classifiers	Sep 1, 2017	ClassificationFake News Detection	—Unverified	0
Annotation, Modelling and Analysis of Fine-Grained Emotions on a Stance and Sentiment Detection Corpus	Sep 1, 2017	Emotion RecognitionGeneral Classification	—Unverified	0
Human Centered NLP with User-Factor Adaptation	Sep 1, 2017	Document ClassificationDomain Adaptation	—Unverified	0
Towards the Understanding of Gaming Audiences by Modeling Twitch Emotes	Sep 1, 2017	Information RetrievalStance Detection	—Unverified	0
Cross-lingual Flames Detection in News Discussions	Sep 1, 2017	Sarcasm DetectionSentiment Analysis	—Unverified	0
UWaterloo at SemEval-2017 Task 8: Detecting Stance towards Rumours with Topic Independent Features	Aug 1, 2017	Rumour DetectionStance Detection	—Unverified	0
OMAM at SemEval-2017 Task 4: English Sentiment Analysis with Conditional Random Fields	Aug 1, 2017	Opinion MiningSentiment Analysis	—Unverified	0
IKM at SemEval-2017 Task 8: Convolutional Neural Networks for stance detection and rumor verification	Aug 1, 2017	Stance DetectionText Categorization	—Unverified	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 31 of 35Next →

All datasets MGTAB RumourEval FNC-1 ARC (AI2 Reasoning Challenge)argmin Dhoroni emergent iac1 ibmcs mtsd Perspectrum poldeb

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	RGT	Acc	87.8	—	Unverified
2	Simple-HGN	Acc	85.3	—	Unverified
3	GCN	Acc	82.4	—	Unverified
4	GAT	Acc	82.2	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	66.58	—	Unverified
2	Kochkina et al. 2017	Accuracy	0.78	—	Unverified
3	Bahuleyan and Vechtomova 2017	Accuracy	0.78	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	83.17	—	Unverified
2	Transition Matrix	F1	77.76	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	64.82	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	62.79	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	BanglaBERT-Dhoroni	Accuracy	0.64	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	82.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	56.97	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	88.06	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	63.96	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	83.11	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	52.76	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	COLA+GPT3.5	Average F1	83.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Boosting	F1	0.87	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	64.71	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	58.72	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	78.61	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	BERT	Average F1	66	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)	Avg F1	0.86	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)	Avg F1	0.84	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	57.47	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	70.98	—	Unverified