SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Stance Detection

Stance detection is the extraction of a subject's reaction to a claim made by a primary actor. It is a core part of a set of approaches to fake news assessment.

Example:

Source: "Apples are the most delicious fruit in existence"
Reply: "Obviously not, because that is a reuben from Katz's"
Stance: deny

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 21–30 of 343 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
A Multi-Task Learning Framework for Multi-Target Stance Detection	Aug 1, 2021	Multi-Task LearningStance Detection	CodeCode Available	1
Exploring Summarization to Enhance Headline Stance Detection	Jun 20, 2021	Fake News DetectionMisinformation	CodeCode Available	1
Knowledge Enhanced Masked Language Model for Stance Detection	May 26, 2021	Language ModelingLanguage Modelling	CodeCode Available	1
Adversarial Learning for Zero-Shot Stance Detection on Social Media	May 14, 2021	Stance DetectionZero-Shot Stance Detection	CodeCode Available	1
Cross-Domain Label-Adaptive Stance Detection	Apr 15, 2021	Domain AdaptationMixture-of-Experts	CodeCode Available	1
Unseen Target Stance Detection with Adversarial Domain Generalization	Oct 12, 2020	Domain GeneralizationStance Detection	CodeCode Available	1
Linked Credibility Reviews for Explainable Misinformation Detection	Aug 28, 2020	MisinformationSemantic Similarity	CodeCode Available	1
A Stance Data Set on Polarized Conversations on Twitter about the Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine as a Treatment for COVID-19	Aug 19, 2020	Stance Detection	CodeCode Available	1
Stance Detection in Web and Social Media: A Comparative Study	Jul 12, 2020	ArticlesStance Detection	CodeCode Available	1
Embeddings-Based Clustering for Target Specific Stances: The Case of a Polarized Turkey	May 19, 2020	ClusteringSentence	CodeCode Available	1

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 3 of 35Next →

All datasets MGTAB RumourEval FNC-1 ARC (AI2 Reasoning Challenge)argmin Dhoroni emergent iac1 ibmcs mtsd Perspectrum poldeb

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	RGT	Acc	87.8	—	Unverified
2	Simple-HGN	Acc	85.3	—	Unverified
3	GCN	Acc	82.4	—	Unverified
4	GAT	Acc	82.2	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	66.58	—	Unverified
2	Kochkina et al. 2017	Accuracy	0.78	—	Unverified
3	Bahuleyan and Vechtomova 2017	Accuracy	0.78	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	83.17	—	Unverified
2	Transition Matrix	F1	77.76	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	64.82	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	62.79	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	BanglaBERT-Dhoroni	Accuracy	0.64	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	82.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	56.97	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	88.06	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	63.96	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	83.11	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	52.76	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	COLA+GPT3.5	Average F1	83.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Boosting	F1	0.87	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	64.71	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	58.72	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	78.61	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	BERT	Average F1	66	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)	Avg F1	0.86	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)	Avg F1	0.84	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	57.47	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	70.98	—	Unverified