SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Stance Detection

Stance detection is the extraction of a subject's reaction to a claim made by a primary actor. It is a core part of a set of approaches to fake news assessment.

Example:

Source: "Apples are the most delicious fruit in existence"
Reply: "Obviously not, because that is a reuben from Katz's"
Stance: deny

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 271–280 of 343 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype	Score
Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Tasks	Apr 20, 2023	Sentiment AnalysisStance Detection	—Unverified	0	0
Can Large Language Models Address Open-Target Stance Detection?	Aug 30, 2024	PositionStance Detection	—Unverified	0	0
Can we trust the evaluation on ChatGPT?	Mar 22, 2023	Language ModelingLanguage Modelling	—Unverified	0	0
Capturing Reliable Fine-Grained Sentiment Associations by Crowdsourcing and Best-Worst Scaling	Dec 5, 2017	Sentiment AnalysisStance Detection	—Unverified	0	0
Capturing Reliable Fine-Grained Sentiment Associations by Crowdsourcing and Best--Worst Scaling	Jun 1, 2016	Sentiment AnalysisStance Detection	—Unverified	0	0
Capturing Stance Dynamics in Social Media: Open Challenges and Research Directions	Sep 1, 2021	Opinion MiningStance Detection	—Unverified	0	0
Automatic detection of stance towards vaccination in online discussion forums	Nov 1, 2017	Binary ClassificationSentiment Analysis	—Unverified	0	0
Catch Me If You Can: Deceiving Stance Detection and Geotagging Models to Protect Privacy of Individuals on Twitter	Jul 23, 2022	Stance Detection	—Unverified	0	0
Chain-of-Thought Embeddings for Stance Detection on Social Media	Oct 30, 2023	Stance Detection	—Unverified	0	0
A Unified Feature Representation for Lexical Connotations	May 31, 2020	Stance Detection	—Unverified	0	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 28 of 35Next →

All datasets MGTAB RumourEval FNC-1 ARC (AI2 Reasoning Challenge)argmin Dhoroni emergent iac1 ibmcs mtsd Perspectrum poldeb

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	RGT	Acc	87.8	—	Unverified
2	Simple-HGN	Acc	85.3	—	Unverified
3	GCN	Acc	82.4	—	Unverified
4	GAT	Acc	82.2	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	66.58	—	Unverified
2	Kochkina et al. 2017	Accuracy	0.78	—	Unverified
3	Bahuleyan and Vechtomova 2017	Accuracy	0.78	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	83.17	—	Unverified
2	Transition Matrix	F1	77.76	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	64.82	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	62.79	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	BanglaBERT-Dhoroni	Accuracy	0.64	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	82.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	56.97	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	88.06	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	63.96	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	83.11	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	52.76	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	COLA+GPT3.5	Average F1	83.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Boosting	F1	0.87	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	64.71	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	58.72	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	78.61	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	BERT	Average F1	66	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)	Avg F1	0.86	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)	Avg F1	0.84	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	57.47	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	70.98	—	Unverified