SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Stance Detection

Stance detection is the extraction of a subject's reaction to a claim made by a primary actor. It is a core part of a set of approaches to fake news assessment.

Example:

Source: "Apples are the most delicious fruit in existence"
Reply: "Obviously not, because that is a reuben from Katz's"
Stance: deny

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 241–250 of 343 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
Agreement Prediction of Arguments in Cyber Argumentation for Detecting Stance Polarity and Intensity	Jul 1, 2020	regressionStance Detection	—Unverified	0
Stance Detection on Social Media: State of the Art and Trends	Jun 5, 2020	Opinion MiningSentiment Analysis	—Unverified	0
A Unified Feature Representation for Lexical Connotations	May 31, 2020	Stance Detection	—Unverified	0
Stance Prediction for Contemporary Issues: Data and Experiments	May 29, 2020	PredictionStance Detection	CodeCode Available	0
StackGenVis: Alignment of Data, Algorithms, and Models for Stacking Ensemble Learning Using Performance Metrics	May 4, 2020	Ensemble LearningStance Detection	CodeCode Available	0
French Tweet Corpus for Automatic Stance Detection	May 1, 2020	Fake News DetectionStance Detection	—Unverified	0
Multilingual Stance Detection in Tweets: The Catalonia Independence Corpus	May 1, 2020	Stance Detection	—Unverified	0
A Few Topical Tweets are Enough for Effective User-Level Stance Detection	Apr 7, 2020	ClusteringGeneral Classification	—Unverified	0
Multilingual Stance Detection: The Catalonia Independence Corpus	Mar 31, 2020	Stance Detection	CodeCode Available	0
Taking a Stance on Fake News: Towards Automatic Disinformation Assessment via Deep Bidirectional Transformer Language Models for Stance Detection	Nov 27, 2019	ArticlesLanguage Modeling	—Unverified	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 25 of 35Next →

All datasets MGTAB RumourEval FNC-1 ARC (AI2 Reasoning Challenge)argmin Dhoroni emergent iac1 ibmcs mtsd Perspectrum poldeb

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	RGT	Acc	87.8	—	Unverified
2	Simple-HGN	Acc	85.3	—	Unverified
3	GCN	Acc	82.4	—	Unverified
4	GAT	Acc	82.2	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	66.58	—	Unverified
2	Kochkina et al. 2017	Accuracy	0.78	—	Unverified
3	Bahuleyan and Vechtomova 2017	Accuracy	0.78	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	83.17	—	Unverified
2	Transition Matrix	F1	77.76	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	64.82	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	62.79	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	BanglaBERT-Dhoroni	Accuracy	0.64	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	82.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	56.97	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	88.06	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	63.96	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	83.11	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	52.76	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	COLA+GPT3.5	Average F1	83.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Boosting	F1	0.87	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	64.71	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	58.72	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	78.61	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	BERT	Average F1	66	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)	Avg F1	0.86	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)	Avg F1	0.84	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	57.47	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TESTED	F1	70.98	—	Unverified