SOTAVerified

Semantic Parsing

Semantic Parsing is the task of transducing natural language utterances into formal meaning representations. The target meaning representations can be defined according to a wide variety of formalisms. This include linguistically-motivated semantic representations that are designed to capture the meaning of any sentence such as λ-calculus or the abstract meaning representations. Alternatively, for more task-driven approaches to Semantic Parsing, it is common for meaning representations to represent executable programs such as SQL queries, robotic commands, smart phone instructions, and even general-purpose programming languages like Python and Java.

Source: Tranx: A Transition-based Neural Abstract Syntax Parser for Semantic Parsing and Code Generation

Papers

Showing 601–625 of 1202 papers

TitleStatusHype
The Groningen Meaning Bank—0
The Language of Actions: Recovering the Syntax and Semantics of Goal-Directed Human Activities—0
The Logic of AMR: Practical, Unified, Graph-Based Sentence Semantics for NLP—0
The Meaning Factory at SemEval-2016 Task 8: Producing AMRs with Boxer—0
The Meaning Factory at SemEval-2017 Task 9: Producing AMRs with Neural Semantic Parsing—0
The Multilingual Paraphrase Database—0
The Norwegian Dependency Treebank—0
The Power of Prompt Tuning for Low-Resource Semantic Parsing—0
The Power of Prompt Tuning for Low-Resource Semantic Parsing—0
The Procedure of Lexico-Semantic Annotation of Sk Treebank—0
The Role of CNL and AMR in Scalable Abstractive Summarization for Multilingual Media Monitoring—0
The SUMMA Platform Prototype—0
The Value of Semantic Parse Labeling for Knowledge Base Question Answering—0
Thirty Musts for Meaning Banking—0
Tidying up the Basement: A Tale of Large-Scale Parsing on National eInfrastructure—0
Token and Type Constraints for Cross-Lingual Part-of-Speech Tagging—0
Toward a Neural Semantic Parsing System for EHR Question Answering—0
Toward Code Generation: A Survey and Lessons from Semantic Parsing—0
Toward Data-Driven Tutorial Question Answering with Deep Learning Conversational Models—0
Towards AMR-BR: A SemBank for Brazilian Portuguese Language—0
Towards Broad-coverage Meaning Representation: The Case of Comparison Structures—0
Towards Collaborative Neural-Symbolic Graph Semantic Parsing via Uncertainty—0
Towards Collaborative Neural-Symbolic Graph Semantic Parsing via Uncertainty—0
Towards Comparability of Linguistic Graph Banks for Semantic Parsing—0
Towards Compositionally Generalizable Semantic Parsing in Large Language Models: A Survey—0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 25 of 49Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ARTEMIS-DAAccuracy (Test)80.8—Unverified
2SynTQA (Oracle)Test Accuracy77.5—Unverified
3TabLaPAccuracy (Test)76.6—Unverified
4SynTQA (GPT)Accuracy (Test)74.4—Unverified
5Mix SCAccuracy (Test)73.6—Unverified
6SynTQA (RF)Accuracy (Test)71.6—Unverified
7CABINETAccuracy (Test)69.1—Unverified
8NormTab+TabSQLifyAccuracy (Test)68.63—Unverified
9Chain-of-TableAccuracy (Test)67.31—Unverified
10Tab-PoTAccuracy (Test)66.78—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1RESDSQL-3B + NatSQLAccuracy84.1—Unverified
2code-davinci-002 175B (LEVER)Accuracy81.9—Unverified
3RASAT+PICARDAccuracy75.5—Unverified
4Graphix-3B + PICARDAccuracy74—Unverified
5T5-3B + PICARDAccuracy71.9—Unverified
6SADGA + GAPAccuracy70.1—Unverified
7RATSQL + GAPAccuracy69.7—Unverified
8RATSQL + Grammar-Augmented Pre-TrainingAccuracy69.6—Unverified
9RATSQL + BERTAccuracy65.6—Unverified
10Exact Set MatchingAccuracy19.7—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Dynamic Least-to-Most PromptingExact Match95—Unverified
2LeARExact Match90.9—Unverified
3T5-3B w/ Intermediate RepresentationsExact Match83.8—Unverified
4Hierarchical Poset DecodingExact Match69—Unverified
5Universal TransformerExact Match18.9—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ReaRevAccuracy76.4—Unverified
2NSM+hAccuracy74.3—Unverified
3CBR-KBQAAccuracy70—Unverified
4STAGG (Yih et al., 2016)Accuracy63.9—Unverified
5T5-11B (Raffel et al., 2020)Accuracy56.5—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1CABINETDenotation accuracy (test)89.5—Unverified
2TAPEX-Large (weak supervision)Denotation accuracy (test)89.5—Unverified
3ReasTAP-Large (weak supervision)Denotation accuracy (test)89.2—Unverified
4NL2SQL-BERTAccuracy89—Unverified
5TAPAS-Large (weak supervision)Denotation accuracy (test)83.6—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PhraseTransformerAccuracy90.4—Unverified
2TranxAccuracy86.2—Unverified
3ASN (Rabinovich et al., 2017)Accuracy85.3—Unverified
4ZH15 (Zhao and Huang, 2015)Accuracy84.2—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1coarse2fineAccuracy88.2—Unverified
2PhraseTransformerAccuracy87.9—Unverified
3TranxAccuracy87.7—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PERIN + RobeCzechF192.36—Unverified
2PERINF192.24—Unverified
3HUJI-KUF158—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PERINF180.52—Unverified
2HUJI-KUF145—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PERINF180.23—Unverified
2HUJI-KUF152—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PERINF194.16—Unverified
2HUJI-KUF163—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PERINF189.83—Unverified
2HUJI-KUF162—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PERINF192.73—Unverified
2HUJI-KUF180—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PERINF189.19—Unverified
2HUJI-KUF154—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1TAPEX-LargeDenotation Accuracy74.5—Unverified
2TAPAS-LargeAccuracy67.2—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PERINF176.4—Unverified
2HUJI-KUF173—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PERINF181.01—Unverified
2HUJI-KUF175—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1HSPEM66.18—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ReasonBERTRF1 Score41.3—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MeMCEExact40.3—Unverified