SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Semantic correspondence

The task of semantic correspondence aims to establish reliable visual correspondence between different instances of the same object category.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 31–40 of 175 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
Cost Aggregation with 4D Convolutional Swin Transformer for Few-Shot Segmentation	Jul 22, 2022	DecoderFew-Shot Semantic Segmentation	CodeCode Available	1
Semantic-Aware Fine-Grained Correspondence	Jul 21, 2022	Pose TrackingSelf-Supervised Learning	CodeCode Available	1
XMorpher: Full Transformer for Deformable Medical Image Registration via Cross Attention	Jun 15, 2022	Deformable Medical Image RegistrationImage Registration	CodeCode Available	1
TransforMatcher: Match-to-Match Attention for Semantic Correspondence	May 23, 2022	Semantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	1
Compositional Temporal Grounding with Structured Variational Cross-Graph Correspondence Learning	Mar 24, 2022	DiversitySemantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	1
CATs++: Boosting Cost Aggregation with Convolutions and Transformers	Feb 14, 2022	Semantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	1
Cost Aggregation Is All You Need for Few-Shot Segmentation	Dec 22, 2021	AllDecoder	CodeCode Available	1
Deep ViT Features as Dense Visual Descriptors	Dec 10, 2021	Feature UpsamplingSemantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	1
SSAT: A Symmetric Semantic-Aware Transformer Network for Makeup Transfer and Removal	Dec 7, 2021	Semantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	1
Multi-Modal Interaction Graph Convolutional Network for Temporal Language Localization in Videos	Oct 12, 2021	Semantic correspondenceSemantic Similarity	CodeCode Available	1

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 4 of 18Next →

All datasets SPair-71k PF-PASCAL PF-WILLOW Caltech-101 AP-10K CUB-200-2011

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	GeoAware-SC (Supervised, AP-10K P.T.)	PCK	85.6	—	Unverified
2	DINOv2	PCK	85.2	—	Unverified
3	GeoAware-SC (Supervised)	PCK	82.9	—	Unverified
4	SD+DINO (Supervised)	PCK	74.6	—	Unverified
5	GeoAware-SC + CleanDIFT (Zero-Shot)	PCK	70	—	Unverified
6	GeoAware-SC (Zero-Shot)	PCK	68.5	—	Unverified
7	SD+DINO + CleanDIFT (Zero-Shot)	PCK	64.8	—	Unverified
8	IFCAT	PCK	64.4	—	Unverified
9	SD+DINO (Zero-shot)	PCK	64	—	Unverified
10	DIFT + CleanDIFT (Zero-Shot)	PCK	61.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DINOv2	PCK	95.8	—	Unverified
2	GeoAware-SC (Supervised, AP-10K P.T.)	PCK	95.7	—	Unverified
3	GeoAware-SC (Supervised)	PCK	95.1	—	Unverified
4	CATs++	PCK	93.8	—	Unverified
5	SD+DINO (Supervised)	PCK	93.6	—	Unverified
6	CATs	PCK	92.6	—	Unverified
7	VAT	PCK	92.3	—	Unverified
8	VAT (ECCV)	PCK	92.3	—	Unverified
9	CHM	PCK	91.6	—	Unverified
10	DHPF	PCK	90.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	LDMCorrespondences	PCK	84.3	—	Unverified
2	VAT (ECCV)	PCK	81.6	—	Unverified
3	VAT	PCK	81	—	Unverified
4	CHM	PCK	79.4	—	Unverified
5	CATs	PCK	79.2	—	Unverified
6	SCOT	PCK	78.1	—	Unverified
7	DHPF	PCK	77.6	—	Unverified
8	HPF	PCK	76.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	HPF	IoU	63	—	Unverified
2	DHPF	IoU	62	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DINOv2	PCK	87.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	LDM Correspondences	Mean PCK@0.05	61.6	—	Unverified