SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Semantic correspondence

The task of semantic correspondence aims to establish reliable visual correspondence between different instances of the same object category.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 141–150 of 175 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
BitSim: An Algebraic Similarity Measure for Description Logics Concepts	Mar 19, 2015	Semantic correspondenceSemantic Similarity	—Unverified	0
Bridging Viewpoint Gaps: Geometric Reasoning Boosts Semantic Correspondence	Jan 1, 2025	Geometric MatchingSemantic correspondence	—Unverified	0
Reference-Based Sketch Image Colorization using Augmented-Self Reference and Dense Semantic Correspondence	May 11, 2020	ColorizationImage Colorization	—Unverified	0
FCSS: Fully Convolutional Self-Similarity for Dense Semantic Correspondence	Feb 3, 2017	ObjectSemantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	0
Feature Robust Optimal Transport for High-dimensional Data	May 25, 2020	feature selectionSemantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	0
Capturing Semantic Similarity for Entity Linking with Convolutional Neural Networks	Apr 4, 2016	Entity LinkingSemantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	0
CPGAN: Full-Spectrum Content-Parsing Generative Adversarial Networks for Text-to-Image Synthesis	Dec 18, 2019	Image GenerationSemantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	0
PatchMatch-Based Neighborhood Consensus for Semantic Correspondence	Jun 19, 2021	Semantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	0
TC-MGC: Text-Conditioned Multi-Grained Contrastive Learning for Text-Video Retrieval	Apr 7, 2025	Contrastive LearningRetrieval	CodeCode Available	0
Lexical Sememe Prediction using Dictionary Definitions by Capturing Local Semantic Correspondence	Jan 16, 2020	Semantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 15 of 18Next →

All datasets SPair-71k PF-PASCAL PF-WILLOW Caltech-101 AP-10K CUB-200-2011

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	GeoAware-SC (Supervised, AP-10K P.T.)	PCK	85.6	—	Unverified
2	DINOv2	PCK	85.2	—	Unverified
3	GeoAware-SC (Supervised)	PCK	82.9	—	Unverified
4	SD+DINO (Supervised)	PCK	74.6	—	Unverified
5	GeoAware-SC + CleanDIFT (Zero-Shot)	PCK	70	—	Unverified
6	GeoAware-SC (Zero-Shot)	PCK	68.5	—	Unverified
7	SD+DINO + CleanDIFT (Zero-Shot)	PCK	64.8	—	Unverified
8	IFCAT	PCK	64.4	—	Unverified
9	SD+DINO (Zero-shot)	PCK	64	—	Unverified
10	DIFT + CleanDIFT (Zero-Shot)	PCK	61.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DINOv2	PCK	95.8	—	Unverified
2	GeoAware-SC (Supervised, AP-10K P.T.)	PCK	95.7	—	Unverified
3	GeoAware-SC (Supervised)	PCK	95.1	—	Unverified
4	CATs++	PCK	93.8	—	Unverified
5	SD+DINO (Supervised)	PCK	93.6	—	Unverified
6	CATs	PCK	92.6	—	Unverified
7	VAT	PCK	92.3	—	Unverified
8	VAT (ECCV)	PCK	92.3	—	Unverified
9	CHM	PCK	91.6	—	Unverified
10	DHPF	PCK	90.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	LDMCorrespondences	PCK	84.3	—	Unverified
2	VAT (ECCV)	PCK	81.6	—	Unverified
3	VAT	PCK	81	—	Unverified
4	CHM	PCK	79.4	—	Unverified
5	CATs	PCK	79.2	—	Unverified
6	SCOT	PCK	78.1	—	Unverified
7	DHPF	PCK	77.6	—	Unverified
8	HPF	PCK	76.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	HPF	IoU	63	—	Unverified
2	DHPF	IoU	62	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DINOv2	PCK	87.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	LDM Correspondences	Mean PCK@0.05	61.6	—	Unverified