SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Semantic correspondence

The task of semantic correspondence aims to establish reliable visual correspondence between different instances of the same object category.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 141–150 of 175 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
Reference-Based Sketch Image Colorization using Augmented-Self Reference and Dense Semantic Correspondence	May 11, 2020	ColorizationImage Colorization	—Unverified	0
SketchDesc: Learning Local Sketch Descriptors for Multi-view Correspondence	Jan 16, 2020	Semantic correspondence	—Unverified	0
Lexical Sememe Prediction using Dictionary Definitions by Capturing Local Semantic Correspondence	Jan 16, 2020	Semantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	0
CPGAN: Full-Spectrum Content-Parsing Generative Adversarial Networks for Text-to-Image Synthesis	Dec 18, 2019	Image GenerationSemantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	0
Learning Semantic Correspondence Exploiting an Object-level Prior	Nov 29, 2019	ObjectSemantic correspondence	—Unverified	0
Hierarchical Semantic Correspondence Learning for Post-Discharge Patient Mortality Prediction	Oct 15, 2019	Mortality PredictionSemantic correspondence	—Unverified	0
Dynamic Context Correspondence Network for Semantic Alignment	Sep 8, 2019	Semantic correspondenceWeakly-supervised Learning	CodeCode Available	0
SPair-71k: A Large-scale Benchmark for Semantic Correspondence	Aug 28, 2019	Semantic correspondence	—Unverified	0
Leveraging Structural and Semantic Correspondence for Attribute-Oriented Aspect Sentiment Discovery	Aug 28, 2019	AttributeSemantic correspondence	—Unverified	0
Hyperpixel Flow: Semantic Correspondence with Multi-layer Neural Features	Aug 18, 2019	Semantic correspondence	CodeCode Available	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 15 of 18Next →

All datasets SPair-71k PF-PASCAL PF-WILLOW Caltech-101 AP-10K CUB-200-2011

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	GeoAware-SC (Supervised, AP-10K P.T.)	PCK	85.6	—	Unverified
2	DINOv2	PCK	85.2	—	Unverified
3	GeoAware-SC (Supervised)	PCK	82.9	—	Unverified
4	SD+DINO (Supervised)	PCK	74.6	—	Unverified
5	GeoAware-SC + CleanDIFT (Zero-Shot)	PCK	70	—	Unverified
6	GeoAware-SC (Zero-Shot)	PCK	68.5	—	Unverified
7	SD+DINO + CleanDIFT (Zero-Shot)	PCK	64.8	—	Unverified
8	IFCAT	PCK	64.4	—	Unverified
9	SD+DINO (Zero-shot)	PCK	64	—	Unverified
10	DIFT + CleanDIFT (Zero-Shot)	PCK	61.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DINOv2	PCK	95.8	—	Unverified
2	GeoAware-SC (Supervised, AP-10K P.T.)	PCK	95.7	—	Unverified
3	GeoAware-SC (Supervised)	PCK	95.1	—	Unverified
4	CATs++	PCK	93.8	—	Unverified
5	SD+DINO (Supervised)	PCK	93.6	—	Unverified
6	CATs	PCK	92.6	—	Unverified
7	VAT	PCK	92.3	—	Unverified
8	VAT (ECCV)	PCK	92.3	—	Unverified
9	CHM	PCK	91.6	—	Unverified
10	DHPF	PCK	90.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	LDMCorrespondences	PCK	84.3	—	Unverified
2	VAT (ECCV)	PCK	81.6	—	Unverified
3	VAT	PCK	81	—	Unverified
4	CHM	PCK	79.4	—	Unverified
5	CATs	PCK	79.2	—	Unverified
6	SCOT	PCK	78.1	—	Unverified
7	DHPF	PCK	77.6	—	Unverified
8	HPF	PCK	76.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	HPF	IoU	63	—	Unverified
2	DHPF	IoU	62	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DINOv2	PCK	87.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	LDM Correspondences	Mean PCK@0.05	61.6	—	Unverified