SOTAVerified

In the Search for Optimal Multi-view Learning Models for Crop Classification with Global Remote Sensing Data

2024-03-25Code Available0· sign in to hype

Francisco Mena, Diego Arenas, Andreas Dengel

Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.

Reproduce

Code

Abstract

Studying and analyzing cropland is a difficult task due to its dynamic and heterogeneous growth behavior. Usually, diverse data sources can be collected for its estimation. Although deep learning models have proven to excel in the crop classification task, they face substantial challenges when dealing with multiple inputs, named Multi-View Learning (MVL). The methods used in the MVL scenario can be structured based on the encoder architecture, the fusion strategy, and the optimization technique. The literature has primarily focused on using specific encoder architectures for local regions, lacking a deeper exploration of other components in the MVL methodology. In contrast, we investigate the simultaneous selection of the fusion strategy and encoder architecture, assessing global-scale cropland and crop-type classifications. We use a range of five fusion strategies (Input, Feature, Decision, Ensemble, Hybrid) and five temporal encoders (LSTM, GRU, TempCNN, TAE, L-TAE) as possible configurations in the MVL method. We use the CropHarvest dataset for validation, which provides optical, radar, weather time series, and topographic information as input data. We found that in scenarios with a limited number of labeled samples, a unique configuration is insufficient for all the cases. Instead, a specialized combination should be meticulously sought, including an encoder and fusion strategy. To streamline this search process, we suggest identifying the optimal encoder architecture tailored for a particular fusion strategy, and then determining the most suitable fusion strategy for the classification task. We provide a methodological framework for researchers exploring crop classification through an MVL methodology.

Tasks

Benchmark Results

DatasetModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
CropHarvest - BrazilFeature fusion with LSTMAverage Accuracy0.98Unverified
CropHarvest - BrazilHybrid fusion with LSTMAverage Accuracy0.97Unverified
CropHarvest - KenyaRadar TS with TempCNNAverage Accuracy0.68Unverified
CropHarvest - KenyaInput Fusion with TAEAverage Accuracy0.67Unverified
CropHarvest - TogoEnsemble aggregation with GRUAverage Accuracy0.84Unverified
CropHarvest - TogoDecision fusion with GRUAverage Accuracy0.83Unverified

Reproductions