Challenges in Data-to-Document Generation
Sam Wiseman, Stuart M. Shieber, Alexander M. Rush
Code Available — Be the first to reproduce this paper.
ReproduceCode
- github.com/harvardnlp/boxscore-dataOfficialIn papernone★ 0
- github.com/harvardnlp/data2textOfficialIn papernone★ 0
- github.com/KaijuML/rotowire-rg-metricpytorch★ 7
- github.com/ratishsp/data2text-1none★ 0
Abstract
Recent neural models have shown significant progress on the problem of generating short descriptive texts conditioned on a small number of database records. In this work, we suggest a slightly more difficult data-to-text generation task, and investigate how effective current approaches are on this task. In particular, we introduce a new, large-scale corpus of data records paired with descriptive documents, propose a series of extractive evaluation methods for analyzing performance, and obtain baseline results using current neural generation methods. Experiments show that these models produce fluent text, but fail to convincingly approximate human-generated documents. Moreover, even templated baselines exceed the performance of these neural models on some metrics, though copy- and reconstruction-based extensions lead to noticeable improvements.
Tasks
Benchmark Results
| Dataset | Model | Metric | Claimed | Verified | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RotoWire | Encoder-decoder + conditional copy | BLEU | 14.19 | — | Unverified |
| RotoWire (Content Ordering) | Encoder-decoder + conditional copy | DLD | 8.68 | — | Unverified |
| Rotowire (Content Selection) | Encoder-decoder + conditional copy | Precision | 29.49 | — | Unverified |
| RotoWire (Relation Generation) | Encoder-decoder + conditional copy | Precision | 74.8 | — | Unverified |