SOTAVerified

Text-To-SQL

Text-to-SQL is a task in natural language processing (NLP) where the goal is to automatically generate SQL queries from natural language text. The task involves converting the text input into a structured representation and then using this representation to generate a semantically correct SQL query that can be executed on a database.

( Image credit: SyntaxSQLNet )

Papers

Recently AddedMost HypedMost ActiveNeeds VerificationMost Verified

Showing 401–424 of 424 papers

TitleStatusHype
Bertrand-DR: Improving Text-to-SQL using a Discriminative Re-rankerCode0
Graph Enhanced Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Generation—0
Data-Anonymous Encoding for Text-to-SQL Generation—0
Leveraging Adjective-Noun Phrasing Knowledge for Comparison Relation Prediction in Text-to-SQL—0
Byte-Pair Encoding for Text-to-SQL GenerationCode0
Content Enhanced BERT-based Text-to-SQL GenerationCode0
CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to DatabasesCode0
Editing-Based SQL Query Generation for Cross-Domain Context-Dependent QuestionsCode0
Zero-shot Text-to-SQL Learning with Auxiliary TaskCode0
Global Reasoning over Database Structures for Text-to-SQL ParsingCode0
Text-to-SQL Generation for Question Answering on Electronic Medical RecordsCode0
Using Database Rule for Weak Supervised Text-to-SQL GenerationCode0
Encoding Database Schemas with Relation-Aware Self-Attention for Text-to-SQL ParsersCode0
SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in ContextCode0
Grammar-based Neural Text-to-SQL Generation—0
Representing Schema Structure with Graph Neural Networks for Text-to-SQL ParsingCode0
One-Shot Learning for Text-to-SQL Generation—0
Clause-Wise and Recursive Decoding for Complex and Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Generation—0
SyntaxSQLNet: Syntax Tree Networks for Complex and Cross-DomainText-to-SQL TaskCode0
SyntaxSQLNet: Syntax Tree Networks for Complex and Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Task—0
IncSQL: Training Incremental Text-to-SQL Parsers with Non-Deterministic Oracles—0
Robust Text-to-SQL Generation with Execution-Guided DecodingCode0
Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation MethodologyCode0
TypeSQL: Knowledge-based Type-Aware Neural Text-to-SQL GenerationCode0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 9 of 9Next →
All datasetsBIRD (BIg Bench for LaRge-scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQL Evaluation)spiderSpider 2.0SParCKaggleDBQASEDESQL-EvalText-To-SQL

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Human PerformanceExecution Accurarcy (Human)92.96—Unverified
2XiYan-SQLExecution Accuracy % (Test)75.63—Unverified
3DSAIR + GPT-4oExecution Accuracy % (Test)74.12—Unverified
4CHASE-SQL + GeminiExecution Accuracy % (Test)74.06—Unverified
5ExSL + granite-34b-codeExecution Accuracy % (Test)73.17—Unverified
6OpenSearch-SQL+ v2 + GPT-4oExecution Accuracy % (Test)72.28—Unverified
7Distillery + GPT-4oExecution Accuracy % (Test)71.83—Unverified
8Insights AIExecution Accuracy % (Test)70.26—Unverified
9PURPLE + RED + GPT-4oExecution Accuracy % (Test)70.21—Unverified
10MCTS-SQLExecution Accuracy % (Test)69.4—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1XiYan-SQLExecution Accuracy (Test)89.65—Unverified
2PET-SQLExecution Accuracy (Test)87.6—Unverified
3datagpt-sql-7B + InvalidSQL-FeedbackExecution Accuracy (Dev)87.2—Unverified
4DAIL-SQL + GPT-4 + Self-ConsistencyExecution Accuracy (Test)86.6—Unverified
5DIN-SQL + GPT-4Execution Accuracy (Test)85.3—Unverified
6datagpt-sql-7BExecution Accuracy (Dev)84.8—Unverified
7MSc-SQLExecution Accuracy (Test)84.7—Unverified
8MARLO + Claude 2.1Execution Accuracy (Test)84—Unverified
9C3 + ChatGPT + Zero-ShotExecution Accuracy (Test)82.3—Unverified
10code-davinci-002 175B (LEVER)Execution Accuracy (Dev)81.9—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Spider-Agent + o1-previewSuccess Rate17.03—Unverified
2Spider-Agent + GPT-4oSuccess Rate10.13—Unverified
3Spider-Agent + Claude-3.5-SonnectSuccess Rate9.02—Unverified
4Spider-Agent + GPT-4Success Rate8.86—Unverified
5Spider-Agent + Qwen2.5-72BSuccess Rate6.17—Unverified
6Spider-Agent + DeepSeek-V2.5Success Rate5.22—Unverified
7Spider-Agent + Gemini-Pro-1.5Success Rate2.53—Unverified
8Spider-Agent + Llama-3.1-405BSuccess Rate2.21—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1RASAT+PICARDinteraction match accuracy45.2—Unverified
2RAT-SQL-TC + GAPinteraction match accuracy43.2—Unverified
3HIE-SQL + GraPPainteraction match accuracy42.9—Unverified
4RAT-SQL + SCoReinteraction match accuracy38.1—Unverified
5EditSQL + BERTinteraction match accuracy25.3—Unverified
6GAZP + BERTinteraction match accuracy23.5—Unverified
7SyntaxSQL-coninteraction match accuracy5.2—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1RAT-SQLExact Match (EM)26.77—Unverified
2Edit-SQLExact Match (EM)11.73—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1T5-LargePCM-F1 (dev)48.2—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1XiYan-SQLExecution Accuracy69.86—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Orange-mini0-shot MRR74.17—Unverified