SOTAVerified

Text-To-SQL

Text-to-SQL is a task in natural language processing (NLP) where the goal is to automatically generate SQL queries from natural language text. The task involves converting the text input into a structured representation and then using this representation to generate a semantically correct SQL query that can be executed on a database.

( Image credit: SyntaxSQLNet )

Papers

Showing 401424 of 424 papers

TitleStatusHype
Uncovering and Categorizing Social Biases in Text-to-SQLCode0
Exploring Underexplored Limitations of Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL GeneralizationCode0
Selective Demonstrations for Cross-domain Text-to-SQLCode0
SelECT-SQL: Self-correcting ensemble Chain-of-Thought for Text-to-SQLCode0
T5-SR: A Unified Seq-to-Seq Decoding Strategy for Semantic ParsingCode0
Semantic Decomposition of Question and SQL for Text-to-SQL ParsingCode0
Explainable Multi-Modal Data Exploration in Natural Language via LLM AgentCode0
Evaluating the Data Model Robustness of Text-to-SQL Systems Based on Real User QueriesCode0
CSS: A Large-scale Cross-schema Chinese Text-to-SQL Medical DatasetCode0
CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to DatabasesCode0
Semi-Automatic Construction of Text-to-SQL Data for Domain TransferCode0
Evaluating and Enhancing LLMs for Multi-turn Text-to-SQL with Multiple Question TypesCode0
ESM+: Modern Insights into Perspective on Text-to-SQL Evaluation in the Age of Large Language ModelsCode0
Correcting Semantic Parses with Natural Language through Dynamic Schema EncodingCode0
Benchmarking and Improving Text-to-SQL Generation under AmbiguityCode0
ShadowGNN: Graph Projection Neural Network for Text-to-SQL ParserCode0
Content Enhanced BERT-based Text-to-SQL GenerationCode0
Sigma: A dataset for text-to-code semantic parsing with statistical analysisCode0
Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugCode0
SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in ContextCode0
Confidence Estimation for Error Detection in Text-to-SQL SystemsCode0
Error Detection for Text-to-SQL Semantic ParsingCode0
Enhancing Open-Domain Table Question Answering via Syntax- and Structure-aware Dense RetrievalCode0
Automated Self-Refinement and Self-Correction for LLM-based Product Attribute Value ExtractionCode0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 17 of 17Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Human PerformanceExecution Accurarcy (Human)92.96Unverified
2XiYan-SQLExecution Accuracy % (Test)75.63Unverified
3DSAIR + GPT-4oExecution Accuracy % (Test)74.12Unverified
4CHASE-SQL + GeminiExecution Accuracy % (Test)74.06Unverified
5ExSL + granite-34b-codeExecution Accuracy % (Test)73.17Unverified
6OpenSearch-SQL+ v2 + GPT-4oExecution Accuracy % (Test)72.28Unverified
7Distillery + GPT-4oExecution Accuracy % (Test)71.83Unverified
8Insights AIExecution Accuracy % (Test)70.26Unverified
9PURPLE + RED + GPT-4oExecution Accuracy % (Test)70.21Unverified
10MCTS-SQLExecution Accuracy % (Test)69.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1XiYan-SQLExecution Accuracy (Test)89.65Unverified
2PET-SQLExecution Accuracy (Test)87.6Unverified
3datagpt-sql-7B + InvalidSQL-FeedbackExecution Accuracy (Dev)87.2Unverified
4DAIL-SQL + GPT-4 + Self-ConsistencyExecution Accuracy (Test)86.6Unverified
5DIN-SQL + GPT-4Execution Accuracy (Test)85.3Unverified
6datagpt-sql-7BExecution Accuracy (Dev)84.8Unverified
7MSc-SQLExecution Accuracy (Test)84.7Unverified
8MARLO + Claude 2.1Execution Accuracy (Test)84Unverified
9C3 + ChatGPT + Zero-ShotExecution Accuracy (Test)82.3Unverified
10code-davinci-002 175B (LEVER)Execution Accuracy (Dev)81.9Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Spider-Agent + o1-previewSuccess Rate17.03Unverified
2Spider-Agent + GPT-4oSuccess Rate10.13Unverified
3Spider-Agent + Claude-3.5-SonnectSuccess Rate9.02Unverified
4Spider-Agent + GPT-4Success Rate8.86Unverified
5Spider-Agent + Qwen2.5-72BSuccess Rate6.17Unverified
6Spider-Agent + DeepSeek-V2.5Success Rate5.22Unverified
7Spider-Agent + Gemini-Pro-1.5Success Rate2.53Unverified
8Spider-Agent + Llama-3.1-405BSuccess Rate2.21Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1RASAT+PICARDinteraction match accuracy45.2Unverified
2RAT-SQL-TC + GAPinteraction match accuracy43.2Unverified
3HIE-SQL + GraPPainteraction match accuracy42.9Unverified
4RAT-SQL + SCoReinteraction match accuracy38.1Unverified
5EditSQL + BERTinteraction match accuracy25.3Unverified
6GAZP + BERTinteraction match accuracy23.5Unverified
7SyntaxSQL-coninteraction match accuracy5.2Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1RAT-SQLExact Match (EM)26.77Unverified
2Edit-SQLExact Match (EM)11.73Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1T5-LargePCM-F1 (dev)48.2Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1XiYan-SQLExecution Accuracy69.86Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Orange-mini0-shot MRR74.17Unverified