Speaker Diarization

Speaker Diarization is the task of segmenting and co-indexing audio recordings by speaker. The way the task is commonly defined, the goal is not to identify known speakers, but to co-index segments that are attributed to the same speaker; in other words, diarization implies finding speaker boundaries and grouping segments that belong to the same speaker, and, as a by-product, determining the number of distinct speakers. In combination with speech recognition, diarization enables speaker-attributed speech-to-text transcription.

Source: Improving Diarization Robustness using Diversification, Randomization and the DOVER Algorithm

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 326–328 of 328 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status
Nouvelle approche pour le regroupement des locuteurs dans des \'emissions radiophoniques et t\'el\'evisuelles (New approach for speaker clustering of broadcast news) [in French]	Jun 1, 2012	ClusteringSpeaker Diarization	—Unverified
An Alternative to Low-level-Sychrony-Based Methods for Speech Detection	Dec 1, 2010	Facial Expression RecognitionFacial Expression Recognition (FER)	—Unverified
A sticky HDP-HMM with application to speaker diarization	May 15, 2009	speaker-diarizationSpeaker Diarization	—Unverified

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 14 of 14Next →

All datasets CALLHOME NIST-SRE 2000 AMI Lapel AMI MixHeadset CH109 DIHARD ETAPE AMI CALLHOME-109 AliMeeting DIHARD II Hub5'00 CallHome

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	COS+NJW-SC (Oracle SAD)	DER(%)	24.05	—	Unverified
2	EEND	DER(%)	23.07	—	Unverified
3	COS+AHC (Oracle SAD)	DER(%)	21.13	—	Unverified
4	SA-EEND (2-spk, no-adapt)	DER(%)	12.66	—	Unverified
5	EEND-OLA	DER(%)	12.57	—	Unverified
6	SA-EEND (2-spk, adapted)	DER(%)	10.76	—	Unverified
7	TOLD	DER(%)	10.14	—	Unverified
8	COS+B-SC (Oracle SAD)	DER(ig olp)	8.78	—	Unverified
9	PLDA+AHC (Oracle SAD)	DER(ig olp)	8.39	—	Unverified
10	COS+NME-SC (Oracle SAD)	DER(ig olp)	7.29	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	x-vector (PLDA + AHC)	DER(%)	8.39	—	Unverified
2	TitaNet-L (NME-SC)	DER(%)	6.73	—	Unverified
3	TitaNet-M (NME-SC)	DER(%)	6.47	—	Unverified
4	TitaNet-S (NME-SC)	DER(%)	6.37	—	Unverified
5	x-vector (MCGAN)	DER(%)	5.73	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ECAPA (SC)	DER(%)	2.36	—	Unverified
2	TitaNet-L (NME-SC)	DER(%)	2.03	—	Unverified
3	TitaNet-S (NME-SC)	DER(%)	2	—	Unverified
4	TitaNet-M (NME-SC)	DER(%)	1.99	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	TitaNet-S (NME-SC)	DER(%)	2.22	—	Unverified
2	TitaNet-M (NME-SC)	DER(%)	1.79	—	Unverified
3	ECAPA (SC)	DER(%)	1.78	—	Unverified
4	TitaNet-L (NME-SC)	DER(%)	1.73	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	x-vector (PLDA + AHC)	DER(%)	9.72	—	Unverified
2	TitaNet-L (NME-SC)	DER(%)	1.19	—	Unverified
3	TitaNet-M (NME-SC)	DER(%)	1.13	—	Unverified
4	TitaNet-S (NME-SC)	DER(%)	1.11	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Baseline (the best result in the literature as of Oct.2019)	DER(%)	11.2	—	Unverified
2	pyannote (MFCC)	DER(%)	10.5	—	Unverified
3	pyannote (waveform)	DER(%)	9.9	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Baseline	DER(%)	7.7	—	Unverified
2	pyannote (MFCC)	DER(%)	5.6	—	Unverified
3	pyannote (waveform)	DER(%)	4.9	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	pyannote (MFCC)	DER(%)	6.3	—	Unverified
2	pyannote (waveform)	DER(%)	6	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	d-vector + spectral	DER(%)	12.54	—	Unverified
2	titanet-s	DER(%)	1.11	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	SOND	DER(%)	4.46	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	UIS-RNN-SML	DER(%)	27.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	UIS-RNN	V	10.6	—	Unverified