SOTAVerified

Service Composition

Let T be the task that the service composition needs to accomplish. The task T can be granulated to T 1 , T 2 , T 3 , T 4 , … , T n . i.e. T = {T 1 , T 2 , T 3 , T 4 , … , T n } . For each task T i , a set of service S i = S i 1 , S i 2 , S i 3 , … , S i m is discovered during the service discovery process such that all services in a set S i perform the same function and have the same input and output parameters (See Figure 2). S 1 = {S 11 , S 12 , S 13 , … , S 1m } , S 2 = {S 21 , S 22 , S 23 , … , S 2m } , S 3 = {S 31 , S 32 , S 33 , … , S 3m } , … , S n = {S n 1 , S n 2 , S n 3 , … , S n m } We need to select one service from each set S i in order to compose the big service such that the overall QoS attributes of the big service are optimal. The total number of the possible distinct service composition is n m . Let k be the the number of QoS attributes. Then the total num- ber of comparisons required are kn m . We need at least kn m comparisons to find whether the solution is optimal, thus making the problem as NP-Hard.

Papers

Showing 3140 of 45 papers

TitleStatusHype
Fast Context-Annotated Classification of Different Types of Web Service Descriptions0
Service Choreography, SBVR, and Time0
Hybrid Optimization Algorithm for Large-Scale QoS-Aware Service Composition0
An Integrated Semantic Web Service Discovery and Composition Framework0
Integration of Workflow and Pipeline for Language Service Composition0
An Overview of Hierarchical Task Network Planning0
Algorithms for Generating Ordered Solutions for Explicit AND/OR Structures0
Representing and Reasoning with Qualitative Preferences for Compositional Systems0
Message-Based Web Service Composition, Integrity Constraints, and Planning under Uncertainty: A New Connection0
A Framework for Semi-automated Web Service Composition in Semantic Web0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 4 of 5Next →

No leaderboard results yet.