SOTAVerified

Semantic Textual Similarity

Semantic textual similarity deals with determining how similar two pieces of texts are. This can take the form of assigning a score from 1 to 5. Related tasks are paraphrase or duplicate identification.

Image source: Learning Semantic Textual Similarity from Conversations

Papers

Recently AddedMost HypedMost ActiveNeeds VerificationMost Verified

Showing 2051–2075 of 2381 papers

TitleStatusHype
Using Summarization to Discover Argument Facets in Online Idealogical Dialog—0
An Optimal Quadratic Approach to Monolingual Paraphrase Alignment—0
Random Walks and Neural Network Language Models on Knowledge Bases—0
Aligning Sentences from Standard Wikipedia to Simple Wikipedia—0
So similar and yet incompatible: Toward the automated identification of semantically compatible words—0
Reserating the awesometastic: An automatic extension of the WordNet taxonomy for novel terms—0
NASARI: a Novel Approach to a Semantically-Aware Representation of Items—0
Can Translation Memories afford not to use paraphrasing?—0
Texts in, meaning out: neural language models in semantic similarity task for Russian—0
Joint Learning of Distributed Representations for Images and Texts—0
Feeling is Understanding: From Affective to Semantic Spaces—0
From distributional semantics to feature norms: grounding semantic models in human perceptual data—0
BitSim: An Algebraic Similarity Measure for Description Logics Concepts—0
Short Text Hashing Improved by Integrating Multi-Granularity Topics and TagsCode0
Context-Dependent Translation Selection Using Convolutional Neural Network—0
Concrete Models and Empirical Evaluations for the Categorical Compositional Distributional Model of Meaning—0
Squibs: When the Whole Is Not Greater Than the Combination of Its Parts: A ``Decompositional'' Look at Compositional Distributional Semantics—0
Probabilistic Zero-shot Classification with Semantic Rankings—0
Deep Semantic Ranking Based Hashing for Multi-Label Image Retrieval—0
Higher-order Lexical Semantic Models for Non-factoid Answer Reranking—0
Learning Composition Models for Phrase EmbeddingsCode0
A web-based tool to Analyze Semantic Similarity Networks—0
Word net based Method for Determining Semantic Sentence Similarity through various Word Senses—0
Needle in a Haystack: Reducing the Costs of Annotating Rare-Class Instances in Imbalanced Datasets—0
LMSim : Computing Domain-specific Semantic Word Similarities Using a Language Modeling Approach—0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 83 of 96Next →
All datasetsSTS BenchmarkMTEBMRPCSICKSTS13STS14STS12STS15STS16MRPC DevSentEvalSICK-R

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1SMARTRoBERTaDev Pearson Correlation92.8—Unverified
2DeBERTa (large)Accuracy92.5—Unverified
3SMART-BERTDev Pearson Correlation90—Unverified
4MT-DNN-SMARTPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensemblePearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
6Mnet-SimPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
7XLNet (single model)Pearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
8ALBERTPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
9T5-11BPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
10RoBERTaPearson Correlation0.92—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-UAESpearman Correlation84.54—Unverified
2ST5-XXLSpearman Correlation82.63—Unverified
3ST5-LargeSpearman Correlation81.83—Unverified
4ST5-XLSpearman Correlation81.66—Unverified
5ST5-BaseSpearman Correlation81.14—Unverified
6MPNet-multilingualSpearman Correlation80.73—Unverified
7SGPT-5.8B-nliSpearman Correlation80.53—Unverified
8MPNetSpearman Correlation80.28—Unverified
9MiniLM-L12Spearman Correlation79.8—Unverified
10SimCSE-BERT-supSpearman Correlation79.12—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MT-DNN-SMARTAccuracy93.7—Unverified
2ALBERTAccuracy93.4—Unverified
3RoBERTa (ensemble)Accuracy92.3—Unverified
4BigBirdF191.5—Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensembleAccuracy91.5—Unverified
6FLOATER-largeAccuracy91.4—Unverified
7SMARTAccuracy91.3—Unverified
8RoBERTa-large 355M (MLP quantized vector-wise, fine-tuned)Accuracy91—Unverified
9RoBERTa-large 355M + Entailment as Few-shot LearnerF191—Unverified
10SpanBERTAccuracy90.9—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
2PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
4SimCSE-RoBERTalargeSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.81—Unverified
6SentenceBERTSpearman Correlation0.75—Unverified
7SRoBERTa-NLI-baseSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
8SRoBERTa-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
9Dino (STS/̄🦕)Spearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
10SBERT-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-LLaMA-7BSpearman Correlation0.91—Unverified
2AnglE-LLaMA-7B-v2Spearman Correlation0.91—Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
4PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
6PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.89—Unverified
7Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-bi (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.89—Unverified
8Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88—Unverified
9Trans-Encoder-RoBERTa-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88—Unverified
10SimCSE-RoBERTa-largeSpearman Correlation0.87—Unverified