SOTAVerified

Semantic Textual Similarity

Semantic textual similarity deals with determining how similar two pieces of texts are. This can take the form of assigning a score from 1 to 5. Related tasks are paraphrase or duplicate identification.

Image source: Learning Semantic Textual Similarity from Conversations

Papers

Showing 17011725 of 2381 papers

TitleStatusHype
Enhancing Adversarial Text Attacks on BERT Models with Projected Gradient Descent0
Enhancing Semantic Similarity Understanding in Arabic NLP with Nested Embedding Learning0
A Semi-supervised Multi-channel Graph Convolutional Network for Query Classification in E-commerce0
Towards Building Efficient Sentence BERT Models using Layer Pruning0
TempRetriever: Fusion-based Temporal Dense Passage Retrieval for Time-Sensitive Questions0
Towards Automated Situation Awareness: A RAG-Based Framework for Peacebuilding Reports0
AI-enhanced semantic feature norms for 786 concepts0
Evaluations at Work: Measuring the Capabilities of GenAI in Use0
2-Tier SimCSE: Elevating BERT for Robust Sentence Embeddings0
3D Compositional Zero-shot Learning with DeCompositional Consensus0
A 2D Semantic-Aware Position Encoding for Vision Transformers0
ABDN at SemEval-2018 Task 10: Recognising Discriminative Attributes using Context Embeddings and WordNet0
A bilingual approach to specialised adjectives through word embeddings in the karstology domain0
Accelerating LLaMA Inference by Enabling Intermediate Layer Decoding via Instruction Tuning with LITE0
Accurate semantic textual similarity for cleaning noisy parallel corpora using semantic machine translation evaluation metric: The NRC supervised submissions to the Parallel Corpus Filtering task0
A Classification-Based Approach to Cognate Detection Combining Orthographic and Semantic Similarity Information0
A Closer Look at Novel Class Discovery from the Labeled Set0
A Cognitive Study on Semantic Similarity Analysis of Large Corpora: A Transformer-based Approach0
A Comparative Study of Conversion Aided Methods for WordNet Sentence Textual Similarity0
A Comparative Study of Recent Large Language Models on Generating Hospital Discharge Summaries for Lung Cancer Patients0
A Comparative Study of Sentence Embedding Models for Assessing Semantic Variation0
A Comparison of Greedy and Optimal Assessment of Natural Language Student Input Using Word-to-Word Similarity Metrics0
A comparison of models of word meaning in context0
A Comparison of Semantic Similarity Methods for Maximum Human Interpretability0
A Comparison of Smoothing Techniques for Bilingual Lexicon Extraction from Comparable Corpora0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 69 of 96Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1SMARTRoBERTaDev Pearson Correlation92.8Unverified
2DeBERTa (large)Accuracy92.5Unverified
3SMART-BERTDev Pearson Correlation90Unverified
4MT-DNN-SMARTPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensemblePearson Correlation0.93Unverified
6Mnet-SimPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
7XLNet (single model)Pearson Correlation0.93Unverified
8ALBERTPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
9T5-11BPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
10RoBERTaPearson Correlation0.92Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-UAESpearman Correlation84.54Unverified
2ST5-XXLSpearman Correlation82.63Unverified
3ST5-LargeSpearman Correlation81.83Unverified
4ST5-XLSpearman Correlation81.66Unverified
5ST5-BaseSpearman Correlation81.14Unverified
6MPNet-multilingualSpearman Correlation80.73Unverified
7SGPT-5.8B-nliSpearman Correlation80.53Unverified
8MPNetSpearman Correlation80.28Unverified
9MiniLM-L12Spearman Correlation79.8Unverified
10SimCSE-BERT-supSpearman Correlation79.12Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MT-DNN-SMARTAccuracy93.7Unverified
2ALBERTAccuracy93.4Unverified
3RoBERTa (ensemble)Accuracy92.3Unverified
4BigBirdF191.5Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensembleAccuracy91.5Unverified
6FLOATER-largeAccuracy91.4Unverified
7SMARTAccuracy91.3Unverified
8RoBERTa-large 355M (MLP quantized vector-wise, fine-tuned)Accuracy91Unverified
9RoBERTa-large 355M + Entailment as Few-shot LearnerF191Unverified
10SpanBERTAccuracy90.9Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.82Unverified
2PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.82Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.82Unverified
4SimCSE-RoBERTalargeSpearman Correlation0.82Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.81Unverified
6SentenceBERTSpearman Correlation0.75Unverified
7SRoBERTa-NLI-baseSpearman Correlation0.74Unverified
8SRoBERTa-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74Unverified
9Dino (STS/̄🦕)Spearman Correlation0.74Unverified
10SBERT-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-LLaMA-7BSpearman Correlation0.91Unverified
2AnglE-LLaMA-7B-v2Spearman Correlation0.91Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.9Unverified
4PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.9Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.9Unverified
6PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.89Unverified
7Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-bi (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.89Unverified
8Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88Unverified
9Trans-Encoder-RoBERTa-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88Unverified
10SimCSE-RoBERTa-largeSpearman Correlation0.87Unverified