SOTAVerified

Semantic Textual Similarity

Semantic textual similarity deals with determining how similar two pieces of texts are. This can take the form of assigning a score from 1 to 5. Related tasks are paraphrase or duplicate identification.

Image source: Learning Semantic Textual Similarity from Conversations

Papers

Recently AddedMost HypedMost ActiveNeeds VerificationMost Verified

Showing 1651–1675 of 2381 papers

TitleStatusHype
Classifying Frames at the Sentence Level in News Articles—0
Variational Inference for Logical Inference—0
Czech Dataset for Semantic Similarity and Relatedness—0
Learning to Score System Summaries for Better Content Selection Evaluation.—0
Lexical Chains meet Word Embeddings in Document-level Statistical Machine Translation—0
Latent Space Embedding for Retrieval in Question-Answer Archives—0
Exploring Vector Spaces for Semantic Relations—0
Speaking, Seeing, Understanding: Correlating semantic models with conceptual representation in the brain—0
Identifying Cognate Sets Across Dictionaries of Related LanguagesCode0
Author-aware Aspect Topic Sentiment Model to Retrieve Supporting Opinions from Reviews—0
Dual Tensor Model for Detecting Asymmetric Lexico-Semantic Relations—0
Parameter Transfer across Domains for Word Sense Disambiguation—0
Word Embeddings based on Fixed-Size Ordinally Forgetting Encoding—0
Portuguese Word Embeddings: Evaluating on Word Analogies and Natural Language TasksCode0
ClaC: Semantic Relatedness of Words and Phrases—0
Gold Standard Online Debates Summaries and First Experiments Towards Automatic Summarization of Online Debate Data—0
Learning Contextual Embeddings for Structural Semantic Similarity using Categorical Information—0
HHU at SemEval-2017 Task 2: Fast Hash-Based Embeddings for Semantic Word Similarity Assessment—0
Wild Devs' at SemEval-2017 Task 2: Using Neural Networks to Discover Word Similarity—0
ResSim at SemEval-2017 Task 1: Multilingual Word Representations for Semantic Textual Similarity—0
What Analogies Reveal about Word Vectors and their Compositionality—0
Comparing Approaches for Automatic Question Identification—0
Ways of Asking and Replying in Duplicate Question Detection—0
RTM at SemEval-2017 Task 1: Referential Translation Machines for Predicting Semantic Similarity—0
OPI-JSA at SemEval-2017 Task 1: Application of Ensemble learning for computing semantic textual similarity—0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 67 of 96Next →
All datasetsSTS BenchmarkMTEBMRPCSICKSTS13STS14STS12STS15STS16MRPC DevSentEvalSICK-R

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1SMARTRoBERTaDev Pearson Correlation92.8—Unverified
2DeBERTa (large)Accuracy92.5—Unverified
3SMART-BERTDev Pearson Correlation90—Unverified
4MT-DNN-SMARTPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensemblePearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
6Mnet-SimPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
7XLNet (single model)Pearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
8ALBERTPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
9T5-11BPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
10RoBERTaPearson Correlation0.92—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-UAESpearman Correlation84.54—Unverified
2ST5-XXLSpearman Correlation82.63—Unverified
3ST5-LargeSpearman Correlation81.83—Unverified
4ST5-XLSpearman Correlation81.66—Unverified
5ST5-BaseSpearman Correlation81.14—Unverified
6MPNet-multilingualSpearman Correlation80.73—Unverified
7SGPT-5.8B-nliSpearman Correlation80.53—Unverified
8MPNetSpearman Correlation80.28—Unverified
9MiniLM-L12Spearman Correlation79.8—Unverified
10SimCSE-BERT-supSpearman Correlation79.12—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MT-DNN-SMARTAccuracy93.7—Unverified
2ALBERTAccuracy93.4—Unverified
3RoBERTa (ensemble)Accuracy92.3—Unverified
4BigBirdF191.5—Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensembleAccuracy91.5—Unverified
6FLOATER-largeAccuracy91.4—Unverified
7SMARTAccuracy91.3—Unverified
8RoBERTa-large 355M (MLP quantized vector-wise, fine-tuned)Accuracy91—Unverified
9RoBERTa-large 355M + Entailment as Few-shot LearnerF191—Unverified
10SpanBERTAccuracy90.9—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
2PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
4SimCSE-RoBERTalargeSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.81—Unverified
6SentenceBERTSpearman Correlation0.75—Unverified
7SRoBERTa-NLI-baseSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
8SRoBERTa-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
9Dino (STS/̄🦕)Spearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
10SBERT-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-LLaMA-7BSpearman Correlation0.91—Unverified
2AnglE-LLaMA-7B-v2Spearman Correlation0.91—Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
4PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
6PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.89—Unverified
7Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-bi (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.89—Unverified
8Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88—Unverified
9Trans-Encoder-RoBERTa-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88—Unverified
10SimCSE-RoBERTa-largeSpearman Correlation0.87—Unverified