SOTAVerified

Semantic Textual Similarity

Semantic textual similarity deals with determining how similar two pieces of texts are. This can take the form of assigning a score from 1 to 5. Related tasks are paraphrase or duplicate identification.

Image source: Learning Semantic Textual Similarity from Conversations

Papers

Showing 1626–1650 of 2381 papers

TitleStatusHype
Using Mined Coreference Chains as a Resource for a Semantic Task—0
Using pseudo-senses for improving the extraction of synonyms from word embeddings—0
Using Semantic Similarity and Text Embedding to Measure the Social Media Echo of Strategic Communications—0
Using Semantic Similarity as Reward for Reinforcement Learning in Sentence Generation—0
Using Single-Trial Representational Similarity Analysis with EEG to track semantic similarity in emotional word processing—0
Using Summarization to Discover Argument Facets in Online Idealogical Dialog—0
Using Summarization to Discover Argument Facets in Online Ideological Dialog—0
Using Text to Teach Image Retrieval—0
Using Thesaurus Data to Improve Coreference Resolution for Russian—0
Using Word Embeddings for Improving Statistical Machine Translation of Phrasal Verbs—0
Using WordNet and Semantic Similarity for Bilingual Terminology Mining from Comparable Corpora—0
A Clustering Framework for Unsupervised and Semi-supervised New Intent Discovery—0
UTA DLNLP at SemEval-2016 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity: A Unified Framework for Semantic Processing and Evaluation—0
UTexas: Natural Language Semantics using Distributional Semantics and Probabilistic Logic—0
UWB at SemEval-2016 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity using Lexical, Syntactic, and Semantic Information—0
UWB at SemEval-2016 Task 2: Interpretable Semantic Textual Similarity with Distributional Semantics for Chunks—0
Varanalysis@SV-Ident 2022: Variable Detection and Disambiguation Based on Semantic Similarity—0
Variational Inference for Logical Inference—0
Variational Information Pursuit with Large Language and Multimodal Models for Interpretable Predictions—0
VCU at Semeval-2016 Task 14: Evaluating definitional-based similarity measure for semantic taxonomy enrichment—0
Vector-space models for PPDB paraphrase ranking in context—0
Vector spaces for historical linguistics: Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diachrony—0
VENSESEVAL at Semeval-2016 Task 2 iSTS - with a full-fledged rule-based approach—0
VidHalluc: Evaluating Temporal Hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models for Video Understanding—0
Viewpoint-aware Video Summarization—0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 66 of 96Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1SMARTRoBERTaDev Pearson Correlation92.8—Unverified
2DeBERTa (large)Accuracy92.5—Unverified
3SMART-BERTDev Pearson Correlation90—Unverified
4MT-DNN-SMARTPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensemblePearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
6Mnet-SimPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
7XLNet (single model)Pearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
8ALBERTPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
9T5-11BPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
10RoBERTaPearson Correlation0.92—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-UAESpearman Correlation84.54—Unverified
2ST5-XXLSpearman Correlation82.63—Unverified
3ST5-LargeSpearman Correlation81.83—Unverified
4ST5-XLSpearman Correlation81.66—Unverified
5ST5-BaseSpearman Correlation81.14—Unverified
6MPNet-multilingualSpearman Correlation80.73—Unverified
7SGPT-5.8B-nliSpearman Correlation80.53—Unverified
8MPNetSpearman Correlation80.28—Unverified
9MiniLM-L12Spearman Correlation79.8—Unverified
10SimCSE-BERT-supSpearman Correlation79.12—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MT-DNN-SMARTAccuracy93.7—Unverified
2ALBERTAccuracy93.4—Unverified
3RoBERTa (ensemble)Accuracy92.3—Unverified
4BigBirdF191.5—Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensembleAccuracy91.5—Unverified
6FLOATER-largeAccuracy91.4—Unverified
7SMARTAccuracy91.3—Unverified
8RoBERTa-large 355M (MLP quantized vector-wise, fine-tuned)Accuracy91—Unverified
9RoBERTa-large 355M + Entailment as Few-shot LearnerF191—Unverified
10SpanBERTAccuracy90.9—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
2PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
4SimCSE-RoBERTalargeSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.81—Unverified
6SentenceBERTSpearman Correlation0.75—Unverified
7SRoBERTa-NLI-baseSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
8SRoBERTa-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
9Dino (STS/̄🦕)Spearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
10SBERT-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-LLaMA-7BSpearman Correlation0.91—Unverified
2AnglE-LLaMA-7B-v2Spearman Correlation0.91—Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
4PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
6PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.89—Unverified
7Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-bi (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.89—Unverified
8Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88—Unverified
9Trans-Encoder-RoBERTa-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88—Unverified
10SimCSE-RoBERTa-largeSpearman Correlation0.87—Unverified