SOTAVerified

Semantic Textual Similarity

Semantic textual similarity deals with determining how similar two pieces of texts are. This can take the form of assigning a score from 1 to 5. Related tasks are paraphrase or duplicate identification.

Image source: Learning Semantic Textual Similarity from Conversations

Papers

Recently AddedMost HypedMost ActiveNeeds VerificationMost Verified

Showing 1601–1625 of 2381 papers

TitleStatusHype
Unsupervised Paraphrasing via Deep Reinforcement Learning—0
Unsupervised selection of semantic relations for improving a distributional thesaurus (S\'election non supervis\'ee de relations s\'emantiques pour am\'eliorer un th\'esaurus distributionnel) [in French]—0
Unsupervised Sentence Representations as Word Information Series: Revisiting TF--IDF—0
Unsupervised Text Summarization of Long Documents using Dependency-based Noun Phrases and Contextual Order Arrangement—0
Unsupervised Word Class Induction for Under-resourced Languages: A Case Study on Indonesian—0
UNT: A Supervised Synergistic Approach to Semantic Text Similarity—0
Unveiling Ontological Commitment in Multi-Modal Foundation Models—0
Unveiling Safety Vulnerabilities of Large Language Models—0
UoW: Multi-task Learning Gaussian Process for Semantic Textual Similarity—0
UOW: Semantically Informed Text Similarity—0
UPC-CORE: What Can Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics and Wikipedia Do for Estimating Semantic Textual Similarity?—0
UQeResearch: Semantic Textual Similarity Quantification—0
Urban2Vec: Incorporating Street View Imagery and POIs for Multi-Modal Urban Neighborhood Embedding—0
Urban Dictionary Embeddings for Slang NLP Applications—0
USAAR-SHEFFIELD: Semantic Textual Similarity with Deep Regression and Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics—0
User-Controlled Knowledge Fusion in Large Language Models: Balancing Creativity and Hallucination—0
User Intent Recognition and Semantic Cache Optimization-Based Query Processing Framework using CFLIS and MGR-LAU—0
USFD at SemEval-2016 Task 1: Putting different State-of-the-Arts into a Box—0
Using a generic neural model for lexical substitution (Utiliser un mod\`ele neuronal g\'en\'erique pour la substitution lexicale) [in French]—0
Using Discourse Information for Paraphrase Extraction—0
Using Distributional Principles for the Semantic Study of Contextual Language Models—0
Using Ellipsis Detection and Word Similarity for Transformation of Spoken Language into Grammatically Valid Sentences—0
Using Entropy Estimates for DAG-Based Ontologies—0
Large-scale study of human memory for meaningful narratives—0
Using LLMs to discover emerging coded antisemitic hate-speech in extremist social media—0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 65 of 96Next →
All datasetsSTS BenchmarkMTEBMRPCSICKSTS13STS14STS12STS15STS16MRPC DevSentEvalSICK-R

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1SMARTRoBERTaDev Pearson Correlation92.8—Unverified
2DeBERTa (large)Accuracy92.5—Unverified
3SMART-BERTDev Pearson Correlation90—Unverified
4MT-DNN-SMARTPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensemblePearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
6Mnet-SimPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
7XLNet (single model)Pearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
8ALBERTPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
9T5-11BPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
10RoBERTaPearson Correlation0.92—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-UAESpearman Correlation84.54—Unverified
2ST5-XXLSpearman Correlation82.63—Unverified
3ST5-LargeSpearman Correlation81.83—Unverified
4ST5-XLSpearman Correlation81.66—Unverified
5ST5-BaseSpearman Correlation81.14—Unverified
6MPNet-multilingualSpearman Correlation80.73—Unverified
7SGPT-5.8B-nliSpearman Correlation80.53—Unverified
8MPNetSpearman Correlation80.28—Unverified
9MiniLM-L12Spearman Correlation79.8—Unverified
10SimCSE-BERT-supSpearman Correlation79.12—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MT-DNN-SMARTAccuracy93.7—Unverified
2ALBERTAccuracy93.4—Unverified
3RoBERTa (ensemble)Accuracy92.3—Unverified
4BigBirdF191.5—Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensembleAccuracy91.5—Unverified
6FLOATER-largeAccuracy91.4—Unverified
7SMARTAccuracy91.3—Unverified
8RoBERTa-large 355M (MLP quantized vector-wise, fine-tuned)Accuracy91—Unverified
9RoBERTa-large 355M + Entailment as Few-shot LearnerF191—Unverified
10SpanBERTAccuracy90.9—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
2PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
4SimCSE-RoBERTalargeSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.81—Unverified
6SentenceBERTSpearman Correlation0.75—Unverified
7SRoBERTa-NLI-baseSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
8SRoBERTa-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
9Dino (STS/̄🦕)Spearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
10SBERT-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-LLaMA-7BSpearman Correlation0.91—Unverified
2AnglE-LLaMA-7B-v2Spearman Correlation0.91—Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
4PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
6PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.89—Unverified
7Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-bi (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.89—Unverified
8Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88—Unverified
9Trans-Encoder-RoBERTa-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88—Unverified
10SimCSE-RoBERTa-largeSpearman Correlation0.87—Unverified