SOTAVerified

Semantic Textual Similarity

Semantic textual similarity deals with determining how similar two pieces of texts are. This can take the form of assigning a score from 1 to 5. Related tasks are paraphrase or duplicate identification.

Image source: Learning Semantic Textual Similarity from Conversations

Papers

Recently AddedMost HypedMost ActiveNeeds VerificationMost Verified

Showing 126–150 of 2381 papers

TitleStatusHype
How Vital is the Jurisprudential Relevance: Law Article Intervened Legal Case Retrieval and Matching—0
CLIMB-3D: Continual Learning for Imbalanced 3D Instance SegmentationCode0
ATEB: Evaluating and Improving Advanced NLP Tasks for Text Embedding Models—0
Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models through Multi-Dimensional Responses—0
Constructing a Norm for Children's Scientific Drawing: Distribution Features Based on Semantic Similarity of Large Language Models—0
Evolutionary Algorithms Approach For Search Based On Semantic Document Similarity—0
A Meta-Evaluation of Style and Attribute Transfer Metrics—0
DeepRTL: Bridging Verilog Understanding and Generation with a Unified Representation Model—0
Exploring RWKV for Sentence Embeddings: Layer-wise Analysis and Baseline Comparison for Semantic SimilarityCode0
Event Segmentation Applications in Large Language Model Enabled Automated Recall Assessments—0
Breaking the Clusters: Uniformity-Optimization for Text-Based Sequential RecommendationCode0
HopRAG: Multi-Hop Reasoning for Logic-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation—0
Balanced Multi-Factor In-Context Learning for Multilingual Large Language Models—0
FaMTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark in Persian Language—0
FinMTEB: Finance Massive Text Embedding BenchmarkCode2
PropNet: a White-Box and Human-Like Network for Sentence Representation—0
Examining Multilingual Embedding Models Cross-Lingually Through LLM-Generated Adversarial Examples—0
Elevating Legal LLM Responses: Harnessing Trainable Logical Structures and Semantic Knowledge with Legal ReasoningCode0
Bridging LLM-Generated Code and Requirements: Reverse Generation technique and SBC Metric for Developer InsightsCode0
PDV: Prompt Directional Vectors for Zero-shot Composed Image Retrieval—0
Can LLMs Replace Human Evaluators? An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge in Software Engineering—0
Enhancing Health Information Retrieval with RAG by Prioritizing Topical Relevance and Factual Accuracy—0
How does a Multilingual LM Handle Multiple Languages?—0
Detecting Backdoor Attacks via Similarity in Semantic Communication Systems—0
How do Humans and Language Models Reason About Creativity? A Comparative Analysis—0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 6 of 96Next →
All datasetsSTS BenchmarkMTEBMRPCSICKSTS13STS14STS12STS15STS16MRPC DevSentEvalSICK-R

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1SMARTRoBERTaDev Pearson Correlation92.8—Unverified
2DeBERTa (large)Accuracy92.5—Unverified
3SMART-BERTDev Pearson Correlation90—Unverified
4MT-DNN-SMARTPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensemblePearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
6Mnet-SimPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
7XLNet (single model)Pearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
8ALBERTPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
9T5-11BPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
10RoBERTaPearson Correlation0.92—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-UAESpearman Correlation84.54—Unverified
2ST5-XXLSpearman Correlation82.63—Unverified
3ST5-LargeSpearman Correlation81.83—Unverified
4ST5-XLSpearman Correlation81.66—Unverified
5ST5-BaseSpearman Correlation81.14—Unverified
6MPNet-multilingualSpearman Correlation80.73—Unverified
7SGPT-5.8B-nliSpearman Correlation80.53—Unverified
8MPNetSpearman Correlation80.28—Unverified
9MiniLM-L12Spearman Correlation79.8—Unverified
10SimCSE-BERT-supSpearman Correlation79.12—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MT-DNN-SMARTAccuracy93.7—Unverified
2ALBERTAccuracy93.4—Unverified
3RoBERTa (ensemble)Accuracy92.3—Unverified
4BigBirdF191.5—Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensembleAccuracy91.5—Unverified
6FLOATER-largeAccuracy91.4—Unverified
7SMARTAccuracy91.3—Unverified
8RoBERTa-large 355M (MLP quantized vector-wise, fine-tuned)Accuracy91—Unverified
9RoBERTa-large 355M + Entailment as Few-shot LearnerF191—Unverified
10SpanBERTAccuracy90.9—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
2PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
4SimCSE-RoBERTalargeSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.81—Unverified
6SentenceBERTSpearman Correlation0.75—Unverified
7SRoBERTa-NLI-baseSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
8SRoBERTa-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
9Dino (STS/̄🦕)Spearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
10SBERT-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-LLaMA-7BSpearman Correlation0.91—Unverified
2AnglE-LLaMA-7B-v2Spearman Correlation0.91—Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
4PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
6PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.89—Unverified
7Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-bi (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.89—Unverified
8Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88—Unverified
9Trans-Encoder-RoBERTa-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88—Unverified
10SimCSE-RoBERTa-largeSpearman Correlation0.87—Unverified