SOTAVerified

Semantic Textual Similarity

Semantic textual similarity deals with determining how similar two pieces of texts are. This can take the form of assigning a score from 1 to 5. Related tasks are paraphrase or duplicate identification.

Image source: Learning Semantic Textual Similarity from Conversations

Papers

Showing 11511175 of 2381 papers

TitleStatusHype
Ebiquity: Paraphrase and Semantic Similarity in Twitter using Skipgrams0
EASE: Entity-Aware Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embedding0
A partition-based similarity for classification distributions0
Dynamic Few-Shot Learning for Knowledge Graph Question Answering0
Bootstrapping Unsupervised Bilingual Lexicon Induction0
Duplicate Detection in a Knowledge Base with PIKA0
A Paraphrase and Semantic Similarity Detection System for User Generated Short-Text Content on Microblogs0
A Graph-theoretic Summary Evaluation for ROUGE0
Duluth : Measuring Cross-Level Semantic Similarity with First and Second Order Dictionary Overlaps0
Dual Tensor Model for Detecting Asymmetric Lexico-Semantic Relations0
Boosting the Performance of Transformer Architectures for Semantic Textual Similarity0
Dual-Stream Knowledge-Preserving Hashing for Unsupervised Video Retrieval0
RealignDiff: Boosting Text-to-Image Diffusion Model with Coarse-to-fine Semantic Re-alignment0
A Parametric Similarity Method: Comparative Experiments based on Semantically Annotated Large Datasets0
DT\_Team at SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Similarity Using Alignments, Sentence-Level Embeddings and Gaussian Mixture Model Output0
DTSim at SemEval-2016 Task 2: Interpreting Similarity of Texts Based on Automated Chunking, Chunk Alignment and Semantic Relation Prediction0
DTSim at SemEval-2016 Task 1: Semantic Similarity Model Including Multi-Level Alignment and Vector-Based Compositional Semantics0
DTAFA: Decoupled Training Architecture for Efficient FAQ Retrieval0
Boosting Few-Shot Learning With Adaptive Margin Loss0
A Graph Based Semi-Supervised Approach for Analysis of Derivational Nouns in Sanskrit0
A comparison of models of word meaning in context0
Do We Need to Differentiate Negative Candidates Before Training a Neural Ranker?0
Book Reviews: Semantic Similarity from Natural Language and Ontology Analysis by S\'ebastien Harispe, Sylvie Ranwez, Stefan Janaqi, and Jacky Montmain0
Do Smaller Language Models Answer Contextualised Questions Through Memorisation Or Generalisation?0
BiVRec: Bidirectional View-based Multimodal Sequential Recommendation0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 47 of 96Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1SMARTRoBERTaDev Pearson Correlation92.8Unverified
2DeBERTa (large)Accuracy92.5Unverified
3SMART-BERTDev Pearson Correlation90Unverified
4MT-DNN-SMARTPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensemblePearson Correlation0.93Unverified
6Mnet-SimPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
7XLNet (single model)Pearson Correlation0.93Unverified
8ALBERTPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
9T5-11BPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
10RoBERTaPearson Correlation0.92Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-UAESpearman Correlation84.54Unverified
2ST5-XXLSpearman Correlation82.63Unverified
3ST5-LargeSpearman Correlation81.83Unverified
4ST5-XLSpearman Correlation81.66Unverified
5ST5-BaseSpearman Correlation81.14Unverified
6MPNet-multilingualSpearman Correlation80.73Unverified
7SGPT-5.8B-nliSpearman Correlation80.53Unverified
8MPNetSpearman Correlation80.28Unverified
9MiniLM-L12Spearman Correlation79.8Unverified
10SimCSE-BERT-supSpearman Correlation79.12Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MT-DNN-SMARTAccuracy93.7Unverified
2ALBERTAccuracy93.4Unverified
3RoBERTa (ensemble)Accuracy92.3Unverified
4BigBirdF191.5Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensembleAccuracy91.5Unverified
6FLOATER-largeAccuracy91.4Unverified
7SMARTAccuracy91.3Unverified
8RoBERTa-large 355M (MLP quantized vector-wise, fine-tuned)Accuracy91Unverified
9RoBERTa-large 355M + Entailment as Few-shot LearnerF191Unverified
10SpanBERTAccuracy90.9Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.82Unverified
2PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.82Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.82Unverified
4SimCSE-RoBERTalargeSpearman Correlation0.82Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.81Unverified
6SentenceBERTSpearman Correlation0.75Unverified
7SRoBERTa-NLI-baseSpearman Correlation0.74Unverified
8SRoBERTa-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74Unverified
9Dino (STS/̄🦕)Spearman Correlation0.74Unverified
10SBERT-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-LLaMA-7BSpearman Correlation0.91Unverified
2AnglE-LLaMA-7B-v2Spearman Correlation0.91Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.9Unverified
4PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.9Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.9Unverified
6PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.89Unverified
7Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-bi (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.89Unverified
8Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88Unverified
9Trans-Encoder-RoBERTa-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88Unverified
10SimCSE-RoBERTa-largeSpearman Correlation0.87Unverified