SOTAVerified

Semantic Textual Similarity

Semantic textual similarity deals with determining how similar two pieces of texts are. This can take the form of assigning a score from 1 to 5. Related tasks are paraphrase or duplicate identification.

Image source: Learning Semantic Textual Similarity from Conversations

Papers

Recently AddedMost HypedMost ActiveNeeds VerificationMost Verified

Showing 1551–1600 of 2381 papers

TitleStatusHype
Large Language Models as Annotators: Enhancing Generalization of NLP Models at Minimal Cost—0
Large Language Models as Topological Structure Enhancers for Text-Attributed Graphs—0
Large Language Models for Automatic Milestone Detection in Group Discussions—0
Large-scale evaluation of dependency-based DSMs: Are they worth the effort?—0
Latent Feature Representation via Unsupervised Learning for Pattern Discovery in Massive Electron Microscopy Image Volumes—0
Latent Semantic Analysis Models on Wikipedia and TASA—0
Latent Space Embedding for Retrieval in Question-Answer Archives—0
Latte-Mix: Measuring Sentence Semantic Similarity with Latent Categorical Mixtures—0
Learning Analogy-Preserving Sentence Embeddings for Answer Selection—0
Learning Antonyms with Paraphrases and a Morphology-Aware Neural Network—0
Learning a Tree of Metrics with Disjoint Visual Features—0
Learning-based Composite Metrics for Improved Caption Evaluation—0
Learning Contextual Embeddings for Structural Semantic Similarity using Categorical Information—0
Learning Cross-lingual Representations with Matrix Factorization—0
Learning Distributional Token Representations from Visual Features—0
Learning event representations for temporal segmentation of image sequences by dynamic graph embedding—0
Learning from Pixel-Level Label Noise: A New Perspective for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation—0
Learning from Unlabelled Data for Clinical Semantic Textual Similarity—0
Learning Geometry-aware Representations by Sketching—0
Learning Graph Embeddings from WordNet-based Similarity Measures—0
Learning Hybrid Representations to Retrieve Semantically Equivalent Questions—0
Learning Job Titles Similarity from Noisy Skill Labels—0
Learning Kernels for Semantic Clustering: A Deep Approach—0
Learning Large-scale Location Embedding From Human Mobility Trajectories with Graphs—0
Learning Modality-Invariant Representations for Speech and Images—0
Learning Monolingual Compositional Representations via Bilingual Supervision—0
Learning Monolingual Sentence Embeddings with Large-scale Parallel Translation Datasets—0
Learning Multilingual Word Embeddings Using Image-Text Data—0
Learning Object Semantic Similarity with Self-Supervision—0
Learning Representations by Contrasting Clusters While Bootstrapping Instances—0
Learning Robust Named Entity Recognizers From Noisy Data With Retrieval Augmentation—0
Learning Semantic Relatedness in Community Question Answering Using Neural Models—0
Learning Semantics and Selectional Preference of Adjective-Noun Pairs—0
Learning Semantic Similarities for Prototypical Classifiers—0
Learning Semantic Similarity for Very Short Texts—0
Learning semantic similarity in a continuous space—0
Learning Semantic Textual Similarity with Structural Representations—0
Learning Text Pair Similarity with Context-sensitive Autoencoders—0
Learning the Impact and Behavior of Syntactic Structure: A Case Study in Semantic Textual Similarity—0
Learning the Impact of Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics for Semantic Textual Similarity—0
Learning Thematic Similarity Metric from Article Sections Using Triplet Networks—0
Learning to Compose Spatial Relations with Grounded Neural Language Models—0
Learning to embed semantic similarity for joint image-text retrieval—0
Learning to hash with semantic similarity metrics and empirical KL divergence—0
Learning to Localize Actions in Instructional Videos with LLM-Based Multi-Pathway Text-Video Alignment—0
Learning to Predict Distributions of Words Across Domains—0
Learning to Score System Summaries for Better Content Selection Evaluation.—0
Learning to segment with limited annotations: Self-supervised pretraining with regression and contrastive loss in MRI—0
Learning To Use Formulas To Solve Simple Arithmetic Problems—0
Learning Tversky Similarity—0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 32 of 48Next →
All datasetsSTS BenchmarkMTEBMRPCSICKSTS13STS14STS12STS15STS16MRPC DevSentEvalSICK-R

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1SMARTRoBERTaDev Pearson Correlation92.8—Unverified
2DeBERTa (large)Accuracy92.5—Unverified
3SMART-BERTDev Pearson Correlation90—Unverified
4MT-DNN-SMARTPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensemblePearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
6Mnet-SimPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
7XLNet (single model)Pearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
8ALBERTPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
9T5-11BPearson Correlation0.93—Unverified
10RoBERTaPearson Correlation0.92—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-UAESpearman Correlation84.54—Unverified
2ST5-XXLSpearman Correlation82.63—Unverified
3ST5-LargeSpearman Correlation81.83—Unverified
4ST5-XLSpearman Correlation81.66—Unverified
5ST5-BaseSpearman Correlation81.14—Unverified
6MPNet-multilingualSpearman Correlation80.73—Unverified
7SGPT-5.8B-nliSpearman Correlation80.53—Unverified
8MPNetSpearman Correlation80.28—Unverified
9MiniLM-L12Spearman Correlation79.8—Unverified
10SimCSE-BERT-supSpearman Correlation79.12—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MT-DNN-SMARTAccuracy93.7—Unverified
2ALBERTAccuracy93.4—Unverified
3RoBERTa (ensemble)Accuracy92.3—Unverified
4BigBirdF191.5—Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensembleAccuracy91.5—Unverified
6FLOATER-largeAccuracy91.4—Unverified
7SMARTAccuracy91.3—Unverified
8RoBERTa-large 355M (MLP quantized vector-wise, fine-tuned)Accuracy91—Unverified
9RoBERTa-large 355M + Entailment as Few-shot LearnerF191—Unverified
10SpanBERTAccuracy90.9—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
2PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
4SimCSE-RoBERTalargeSpearman Correlation0.82—Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.81—Unverified
6SentenceBERTSpearman Correlation0.75—Unverified
7SRoBERTa-NLI-baseSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
8SRoBERTa-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
9Dino (STS/̄🦕)Spearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
10SBERT-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-LLaMA-7BSpearman Correlation0.91—Unverified
2AnglE-LLaMA-7B-v2Spearman Correlation0.91—Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
4PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.9—Unverified
6PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.89—Unverified
7Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-bi (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.89—Unverified
8Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88—Unverified
9Trans-Encoder-RoBERTa-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88—Unverified
10SimCSE-RoBERTa-largeSpearman Correlation0.87—Unverified