SOTAVerified

Semantic Textual Similarity

Semantic textual similarity deals with determining how similar two pieces of texts are. This can take the form of assigning a score from 1 to 5. Related tasks are paraphrase or duplicate identification.

Image source: Learning Semantic Textual Similarity from Conversations

Papers

Showing 701725 of 2381 papers

TitleStatusHype
Contrasting Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Relations: Insights from Distributional Semantic Models0
A Theory-Driven Self-Labeling Refinement Method for Contrastive Representation Learning0
A Text is Worth Several Tokens: Text Embedding from LLMs Secretly Aligns Well with The Key Tokens0
Amrita\_CEN at SemEval-2016 Task 1: Semantic Relation from Word Embeddings in Higher Dimension0
Accurate semantic textual similarity for cleaning noisy parallel corpora using semantic machine translation evaluation metric: The NRC supervised submissions to the Parallel Corpus Filtering task0
ConTFV: A Contrastive Learning Framework for Table-based Fact Verification0
A text autoencoder from transformer for fast encoding language representation0
Context Vector Disambiguation for Bilingual Lexicon Extraction from Comparable Corpora0
Contextualizing the Limits of Model & Evaluation Dataset Curation on Semantic Similarity Classification Tasks0
ATEB: Evaluating and Improving Advanced NLP Tasks for Text Embedding Models0
Contextualized Usage-Based Material Selection0
Contextual ASR Error Handling with LLMs Augmentation for Goal-Oriented Conversational AI0
ATA-Sem: Chunk-based Determination of Semantic Text Similarity0
Context Effects on Human Judgments of Similarity0
Context-Dependent Translation Selection Using Convolutional Neural Network0
A Systematic Study of Semantic Vector Space Model Parameters0
Amplifying the Range of News Stories with Creativity: Methods and their Evaluation, in Portuguese0
Context-Aware Human Behavior Prediction Using Multimodal Large Language Models: Challenges and Insights0
Content Selection through Paraphrase Detection: Capturing different Semantic Realisations of the Same Idea0
A Survey on Text Simplification0
A Modified Word Saliency-Based Adversarial Attack on Text Classification Models0
Constructing a Norm for Children's Scientific Drawing: Distribution Features Based on Semantic Similarity of Large Language Models0
A Survey on Automatically-Constructed WordNets and their Evaluation: Lexical and Word Embedding-based Approaches0
Consistency of Responses and Continuations Generated by Large Language Models on Social Media0
Conservative Bias in Large Language Models: Measuring Relation Predictions0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 29 of 96Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1SMARTRoBERTaDev Pearson Correlation92.8Unverified
2DeBERTa (large)Accuracy92.5Unverified
3SMART-BERTDev Pearson Correlation90Unverified
4MT-DNN-SMARTPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensemblePearson Correlation0.93Unverified
6Mnet-SimPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
7XLNet (single model)Pearson Correlation0.93Unverified
8ALBERTPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
9T5-11BPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
10RoBERTaPearson Correlation0.92Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-UAESpearman Correlation84.54Unverified
2ST5-XXLSpearman Correlation82.63Unverified
3ST5-LargeSpearman Correlation81.83Unverified
4ST5-XLSpearman Correlation81.66Unverified
5ST5-BaseSpearman Correlation81.14Unverified
6MPNet-multilingualSpearman Correlation80.73Unverified
7SGPT-5.8B-nliSpearman Correlation80.53Unverified
8MPNetSpearman Correlation80.28Unverified
9MiniLM-L12Spearman Correlation79.8Unverified
10SimCSE-BERT-supSpearman Correlation79.12Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MT-DNN-SMARTAccuracy93.7Unverified
2ALBERTAccuracy93.4Unverified
3RoBERTa (ensemble)Accuracy92.3Unverified
4BigBirdF191.5Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensembleAccuracy91.5Unverified
6FLOATER-largeAccuracy91.4Unverified
7SMARTAccuracy91.3Unverified
8RoBERTa-large 355M (MLP quantized vector-wise, fine-tuned)Accuracy91Unverified
9RoBERTa-large 355M + Entailment as Few-shot LearnerF191Unverified
10SpanBERTAccuracy90.9Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.82Unverified
2PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.82Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.82Unverified
4SimCSE-RoBERTalargeSpearman Correlation0.82Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.81Unverified
6SentenceBERTSpearman Correlation0.75Unverified
7SRoBERTa-NLI-baseSpearman Correlation0.74Unverified
8SRoBERTa-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74Unverified
9Dino (STS/̄🦕)Spearman Correlation0.74Unverified
10SBERT-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-LLaMA-7BSpearman Correlation0.91Unverified
2AnglE-LLaMA-7B-v2Spearman Correlation0.91Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.9Unverified
4PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.9Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.9Unverified
6PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.89Unverified
7Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-bi (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.89Unverified
8Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88Unverified
9Trans-Encoder-RoBERTa-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88Unverified
10SimCSE-RoBERTa-largeSpearman Correlation0.87Unverified