SOTAVerified

Semantic Textual Similarity

Semantic textual similarity deals with determining how similar two pieces of texts are. This can take the form of assigning a score from 1 to 5. Related tasks are paraphrase or duplicate identification.

Image source: Learning Semantic Textual Similarity from Conversations

Papers

Showing 651675 of 2381 papers

TitleStatusHype
Efficient Heuristics Generation for Solving Combinatorial Optimization Problems Using Large Language ModelsCode0
Measuring Semantic Similarity of Words Using Concept NetworksCode0
A character-based steganography using masked language modelingCode0
Correlations between Word Vector SetsCode0
Correlation Coefficients and Semantic Textual SimilarityCode0
Augmented SBERT: Data Augmentation Method for Improving Bi-Encoders for Pairwise Sentence Scoring TasksCode0
A Comparative Study of Text Embedding Models for Semantic Text Similarity in Bug ReportsCode0
A Multi-Task Approach for Disentangling Syntax and Semantics in Sentence RepresentationsCode0
Contextualized Semantic Distance between Highly Overlapped TextsCode0
MixMOOD: A systematic approach to class distribution mismatch in semi-supervised learning using deep dataset dissimilarity measuresCode0
MobileBERT: a Compact Task-Agnostic BERT for Resource-Limited DevicesCode0
Model Comparison for Semantic GroupingCode0
A Novel Patent Similarity Measurement Methodology: Semantic Distance and Technological DistanceCode0
MoralStrength: Exploiting a Moral Lexicon and Embedding Similarity for Moral Foundations PredictionCode0
Correcting ContradictionsCode0
MSnet: A BERT-based Network for Gendered Pronoun ResolutionCode0
EL Embeddings: Geometric construction of models for the Description Logic EL ++Code0
MultiHal: Multilingual Dataset for Knowledge-Graph Grounded Evaluation of LLM HallucinationsCode0
Doubly-Trained Adversarial Data Augmentation for Neural Machine TranslationCode0
COPER: a Query-adaptable Semantics-based Search Engine for Persian COVID-19 ArticlesCode0
Don’t Judge a Language Model by Its Last Layer: Contrastive Learning with Layer-Wise Attention PoolingCode0
Don't Judge a Language Model by Its Last Layer: Contrastive Learning with Layer-Wise Attention PoolingCode0
BIS: NL2SQL Service Evaluation Benchmark for Business Intelligence ScenariosCode0
Domain Adaptation for Japanese Sentence Embeddings with Contrastive Learning based on Synthetic Sentence GenerationCode0
Don't Settle for Average, Go for the Max: Fuzzy Sets and Max-Pooled Word VectorsCode0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 27 of 96Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1SMARTRoBERTaDev Pearson Correlation92.8Unverified
2DeBERTa (large)Accuracy92.5Unverified
3SMART-BERTDev Pearson Correlation90Unverified
4MT-DNN-SMARTPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensemblePearson Correlation0.93Unverified
6Mnet-SimPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
7XLNet (single model)Pearson Correlation0.93Unverified
8ALBERTPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
9T5-11BPearson Correlation0.93Unverified
10RoBERTaPearson Correlation0.92Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-UAESpearman Correlation84.54Unverified
2ST5-XXLSpearman Correlation82.63Unverified
3ST5-LargeSpearman Correlation81.83Unverified
4ST5-XLSpearman Correlation81.66Unverified
5ST5-BaseSpearman Correlation81.14Unverified
6MPNet-multilingualSpearman Correlation80.73Unverified
7SGPT-5.8B-nliSpearman Correlation80.53Unverified
8MPNetSpearman Correlation80.28Unverified
9MiniLM-L12Spearman Correlation79.8Unverified
10SimCSE-BERT-supSpearman Correlation79.12Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MT-DNN-SMARTAccuracy93.7Unverified
2ALBERTAccuracy93.4Unverified
3RoBERTa (ensemble)Accuracy92.3Unverified
4BigBirdF191.5Unverified
5StructBERTRoBERTa ensembleAccuracy91.5Unverified
6FLOATER-largeAccuracy91.4Unverified
7SMARTAccuracy91.3Unverified
8RoBERTa-large 355M (MLP quantized vector-wise, fine-tuned)Accuracy91Unverified
9RoBERTa-large 355M + Entailment as Few-shot LearnerF191Unverified
10SpanBERTAccuracy90.9Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.82Unverified
2PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.82Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.82Unverified
4SimCSE-RoBERTalargeSpearman Correlation0.82Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.81Unverified
6SentenceBERTSpearman Correlation0.75Unverified
7SRoBERTa-NLI-baseSpearman Correlation0.74Unverified
8SRoBERTa-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74Unverified
9Dino (STS/̄🦕)Spearman Correlation0.74Unverified
10SBERT-NLI-largeSpearman Correlation0.74Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1AnglE-LLaMA-7BSpearman Correlation0.91Unverified
2AnglE-LLaMA-7B-v2Spearman Correlation0.91Unverified
3PromptEOL+CSE+LLaMA-30BSpearman Correlation0.9Unverified
4PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-13BSpearman Correlation0.9Unverified
5PromptEOL+CSE+OPT-2.7BSpearman Correlation0.9Unverified
6PromCSE-RoBERTa-large (0.355B)Spearman Correlation0.89Unverified
7Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-bi (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.89Unverified
8Trans-Encoder-BERT-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88Unverified
9Trans-Encoder-RoBERTa-large-cross (unsup.)Spearman Correlation0.88Unverified
10SimCSE-RoBERTa-largeSpearman Correlation0.87Unverified