Semantic Role Labeling

Semantic role labeling aims to model the predicate-argument structure of a sentence and is often described as answering "Who did what to whom". BIO notation is typically used for semantic role labeling.

Example:

| Housing | starts | are | expected | to | quicken | a | bit | from | August’s | pace | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | B-ARG1 | I-ARG1 | O | O | O | V | B-ARG2 | I-ARG2 | B-ARG3 | I-ARG3 | I-ARG3 |

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 191–200 of 620 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Open Relation Extraction	Oct 1, 2013	Dependency ParsingPart-Of-Speech Tagging	—Unverified
Beyond The Text: Analysis of Privacy Statements through Syntactic and Semantic Role Labeling	Oct 1, 2020	Question AnsweringSemantic Role Labeling	—Unverified
Dynamic web service deployment in a cloud environment	May 1, 2012	Semantic Role LabelingSpeech Recognition	—Unverified
Duluth: Word Sense Discrimination in the Service of Lexicography	Jun 1, 2015	ChunkingSemantic Role Labeling	—Unverified
Encoding Syntactic Constituency Paths for Frame-Semantic Parsing with Graph Convolutional Networks	Nov 26, 2020	Semantic ParsingSemantic Role Labeling	—Unverified
End-to-End Learning for Structured Prediction Energy Networks	Mar 16, 2017	DenoisingImage Denoising	—Unverified
End-to-end learning of semantic role labeling using recurrent neural networks	Jul 1, 2015	Semantic ParsingSemantic Role Labeling	—Unverified
Better Word Representations with Recursive Neural Networks for Morphology	Aug 1, 2013	Language ModellingNamed Entity Recognition (NER)	—Unverified
Domain Specific Automatic Question Generation from Text	Jul 1, 2017	Dependency ParsingQuestion Generation	—Unverified
Annotating the Little Prince with Chinese AMRs	Aug 1, 2016	Dependency ParsingSemantic Role Labeling	—Unverified

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 20 of 62Next →

All datasets OntoNotes CoNLL 2005 CoNLL05 Brown CoNLL05 WSJ CoNLL12 CoNLL-2009 CoNLL-2012

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	HeSyFu	F1	88.59	—	Unverified
2	CRF2o + RoBERTa	F1	88.32	—	Unverified
3	MRC-SRL	F1	88.3	—	Unverified
4	ReCAT(pretrained on wikitext103)	F1	88	—	Unverified
5	SRL-MM + XLNet	F1	87.67	—	Unverified
6	CRF2o + BERT	F1	87.66	—	Unverified
7	RoBERTa+RegCCRF	F1	87.51	—	Unverified
8	RoBERTa+CRF	F1	87.27	—	Unverified
9	BiLSTM-Span (Ensemble)	F1	87	—	Unverified
10	BiLSTM-Span	F1	86.2	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MRC-SRL	F1	90	—	Unverified
2	SRL-MM + XLNet	F1	89.8	—	Unverified
3	CRF2o + RoBERTa	F1	89.54	—	Unverified
4	HeSyFu	F1	89.04	—	Unverified
5	CRF2o + BERT	F1	89.03	—	Unverified
6	Mohammadshahi and Henderson (2021)	F1	88.93	—	Unverified
7	BiLSTM-Span (Ensemble, predicates given)	F1	88.5	—	Unverified
8	CRF2o	F1	87.87	—	Unverified
9	Li et al. (2019) (Ensemble)	F1	87.7	—	Unverified
10	BiLSTM-Span	F1	87.6	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeepStruct multi-task w/ finetune	F1	92.1	—	Unverified
2	DeepStruct multi-task	F1	92	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeepStruct multi-task	F1	95.5	—	Unverified
2	DeepStruct multi-task w/ finetune	F1	95.2	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeepStruct multi-task	F1	97.2	—	Unverified
2	DeepStruct multi-task w/ finetune	F1	96	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Ours (High-Order model)	F1 (Arg.)	90.2	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	HeSyFu	Avg. F1	88.59	—	Unverified