Semantic Role Labeling

Semantic role labeling aims to model the predicate-argument structure of a sentence and is often described as answering "Who did what to whom". BIO notation is typically used for semantic role labeling.

Example:

| Housing | starts | are | expected | to | quicken | a | bit | from | August’s | pace | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | B-ARG1 | I-ARG1 | O | O | O | V | B-ARG2 | I-ARG2 | B-ARG3 | I-ARG3 | I-ARG3 |

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 131–140 of 620 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status
Predicate Representations and Polysemy in VerbNet Semantic Parsing	Jun 1, 2021	Semantic ParsingSemantic Role Labeling	CodeCode Available
Tuning Deep Active Learning for Semantic Role Labeling	Jun 1, 2021	Active LearningSemantic Role Labeling	—Unverified
Encoder-decoder based unified semantic role labeling with label-aware syntax	May 18, 2021	DecoderSemantic Role Labeling	CodeCode Available
Neural Unsupervised Semantic Role Labeling	Apr 19, 2021	ClusteringSemantic Role Labeling	—Unverified
Knowledge Graph Anchored Information-Extraction for Domain-Specific Insights	Apr 18, 2021	Semantic Role Labeling	—Unverified
Syntax-Aware Graph-to-Graph Transformer for Semantic Role Labelling	Apr 15, 2021	Semantic Role Labeling	—Unverified
Conversational Semantic Role Labeling	Apr 11, 2021	coreference-resolutionCoreference Resolution	—Unverified
Extracting Semantic Process Information from the Natural Language in Event Logs	Mar 6, 2021	AttributeLanguage Modeling	—Unverified
Multi-document Summarization using Semantic Role Labeling and Semantic Graph for Indonesian News Article	Mar 5, 2021	ArticlesDocument Summarization	—Unverified
Hierarchical Multitask Learning with Dependency Parsing for Japanese Semantic Role Labeling Improves Performance of Argument Identification	Jan 15, 2021	Dependency ParsingSemantic Role Labeling	—Unverified

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 14 of 62Next →

All datasets OntoNotes CoNLL 2005 CoNLL05 Brown CoNLL05 WSJ CoNLL12 CoNLL-2009 CoNLL-2012

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	HeSyFu	F1	88.59	—	Unverified
2	CRF2o + RoBERTa	F1	88.32	—	Unverified
3	MRC-SRL	F1	88.3	—	Unverified
4	ReCAT(pretrained on wikitext103)	F1	88	—	Unverified
5	SRL-MM + XLNet	F1	87.67	—	Unverified
6	CRF2o + BERT	F1	87.66	—	Unverified
7	RoBERTa+RegCCRF	F1	87.51	—	Unverified
8	RoBERTa+CRF	F1	87.27	—	Unverified
9	BiLSTM-Span (Ensemble)	F1	87	—	Unverified
10	BiLSTM-Span	F1	86.2	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	MRC-SRL	F1	90	—	Unverified
2	SRL-MM + XLNet	F1	89.8	—	Unverified
3	CRF2o + RoBERTa	F1	89.54	—	Unverified
4	HeSyFu	F1	89.04	—	Unverified
5	CRF2o + BERT	F1	89.03	—	Unverified
6	Mohammadshahi and Henderson (2021)	F1	88.93	—	Unverified
7	BiLSTM-Span (Ensemble, predicates given)	F1	88.5	—	Unverified
8	CRF2o	F1	87.87	—	Unverified
9	Li et al. (2019) (Ensemble)	F1	87.7	—	Unverified
10	BiLSTM-Span	F1	87.6	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeepStruct multi-task w/ finetune	F1	92.1	—	Unverified
2	DeepStruct multi-task	F1	92	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeepStruct multi-task	F1	95.5	—	Unverified
2	DeepStruct multi-task w/ finetune	F1	95.2	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeepStruct multi-task	F1	97.2	—	Unverified
2	DeepStruct multi-task w/ finetune	F1	96	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Ours (High-Order model)	F1 (Arg.)	90.2	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	HeSyFu	Avg. F1	88.59	—	Unverified