SOTAVerified

Sarcasm Detection

The goal of Sarcasm Detection is to determine whether a sentence is sarcastic or non-sarcastic. Sarcasm is a type of phenomenon with specific perlocutionary effects on the hearer, such as to break their pattern of expectation. Consequently, correct understanding of sarcasm often requires a deep understanding of multiple sources of information, including the utterance, the conversational context, and, frequently some real world facts.

Source: Attentional Multi-Reading Sarcasm Detection

Papers

Showing 226250 of 266 papers

TitleStatusHype
C-Net: Contextual Network for Sarcasm Detection0
CNN- and LSTM-based Claim Classification in Online User Comments0
Combining Context-Free and Contextualized Representations for Arabic Sarcasm Detection and Sentiment Identification0
Commander-GPT: Fully Unleashing the Sarcasm Detection Capability of Multi-Modal Large Language Models0
Computational Sarcasm0
Computational Sarcasm Analysis on Social Media: A Systematic Review0
connotation_clashers at SemEval-2022 Task 6: The effect of sentiment analysis on sarcasm detection0
Context-Aware Sarcasm Detection Using BERT0
Cross-Cultural Transfer Learning for Text Classification0
Cross-lingual Flames Detection in News Discussions0
CrystalNest at SemEval-2017 Task 4: Using Sarcasm Detection for Enhancing Sentiment Classification and Quantification0
Dartmouth at SemEval-2022 Task 6: Detection of Sarcasm0
Debiasing Multimodal Sarcasm Detection with Contrastive Learning0
Deep Multi-Task Model for Sarcasm Detection and Sentiment Analysis in Arabic Language0
Detecting Emotional Incongruity of Sarcasm by Commonsense Reasoning0
Detecting Sarcasm in Conversation Context Using Transformer-Based Models0
Detecting Sarcasm is Extremely Easy ;-)0
Detecting Sarcasm Using Different Forms Of Incongruity0
DUCS at SemEval-2022 Task 6: Exploring Emojis and Sentiments for Sarcasm Detection0
Emotion Enriched Retrofitted Word Embeddings0
Enhancing Multimodal Affective Analysis with Learned Live Comment Features0
Evaluating Large Language Models Against Human Annotators in Latent Content Analysis: Sentiment, Political Leaning, Emotional Intensity, and Sarcasm0
Expect the unexpected: Harnessing Sentence Completion for Sarcasm Detection0
Explainable Detection of Sarcasm in Social Media0
Exploring Author Context for Detecting Intended vs Perceived Sarcasm0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 10 of 11Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1PaLM 2(few-shot, k=3, CoT)Accuracy84.8Unverified
2PaLM 2 (few-shot, k=3, Direct)Accuracy78.7Unverified
3PaLM 540B (few-shot, k=3)Accuracy78.1Unverified
4BLOOM 176B (few-shot, k=3)Accuracy72.47Unverified
5Bloomberg GPT (few-shot, k=3)Accuracy69.66Unverified
6GPT-NeoX (few-shot, k=3)Accuracy62.36Unverified
7Chinchilla-70B (few-shot, k=5)Accuracy58.6Unverified
8Gopher-280B (few-shot, k=5)Accuracy48.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1BERT+Aspect-based approachesF10.74Unverified
2RoBERTa_large - (Separated Context-Response)F10.72Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1RoBERTa_large (Context-Response)F10.77Unverified
2BERTF10.73Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1CASCADEAccuracy77Unverified
2Bag-of-BigramsAccuracy75.8Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Bag-of-BigramsAccuracy76.5Unverified
2CASCADEAccuracy74Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1RoBERTa + Mutation Data AugmentationF1-Score0.41Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MUStARD++Precision70.2Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Bag-of-WordsAvg F127Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1BARTR136.88Unverified