SOTAVerified

Point Cloud Quality Assessment

Background

A large and dense collection of points in three-dimensional space, collected by sensors such as LiDAR, is known as a point cloud. Points in the point cloud consist of geometric properties, such as three-dimensional spatial coordinates (x, y, z), and other attributes like color, reflectance, opacity, etc., represented by feature vectors. Since point clouds can directly represent the 3D world, they are widely employed in various fields, such as photogrammetry, power monitoring, architectural surveying, digital manufacturing, autonomous driving, gaming, cultural heritage reservation, and more.

Significance

Interactive point clouds typically contain millions of colored points and may possess complex attributes. To address the substantial transmission bandwidth and storage space required by point clouds, esearchers have developed various point cloud compression (PCC) techniques. However, point cloud compression may introduce significant visual distortions. In addition, deformations and distortions frequently occur during the acquisition, processing, transmission, rendering, and interaction of point clouds, all of which degrade the visual quality of the point cloud, ultimately impacting the application’s user experience. Therefore, effective methods for quantifying the quality of compressed point clouds are needed. More generally, point cloud quality assessment (PCQA) is crucial for optimizing and evaluating point cloud processing algorithms, such as encoding, denoising, and super-resolution.

Papers

Showing 1–25 of 40 papers

TitleStatusHype
Point Cloud Compression and Objective Quality Assessment: A Survey—0
DPCD: A Quality Assessment Database for Dynamic Point Clouds—0
The Worse The Better: Content-Aware Viewpoint Generation Network for Projection-related Point Cloud Quality AssessmentCode0
No-reference geometry quality assessment for colorless point clouds via list-wise rank learningCode0
From Images to Point Clouds: An Efficient Solution for Cross-media Blind Quality Assessment without Annotated Training—0
CLIP-PCQA: Exploring Subjective-Aligned Vision-Language Modeling for Point Cloud Quality AssessmentCode0
No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Graph Convolutional NetworkCode0
Learning Disentangled Representations for Perceptual Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Mutual Information Minimization—0
Perceptual Quality Assessment of Trisoup-Lifting Encoded 3D Point CloudsCode0
Asynchronous Feedback Network for Perceptual Point Cloud Quality AssessmentCode0
Perception-Guided Quality Metric of 3D Point Clouds Using Hybrid StrategyCode0
Image-Guided Outdoor LiDAR Perception Quality Assessment for Autonomous Driving—0
Full reference point cloud quality assessment using support vector regressionCode0
Full-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment Using Spectral Graph Wavelets—0
LMM-PCQA: Assisting Point Cloud Quality Assessment with LMMCode1
PAME: Self-Supervised Masked Autoencoder for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment—0
Contrastive Pre-Training with Multi-View Fusion for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment—0
Stochasticity-aware No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment—0
Activating Frequency and ViT for 3D Point Cloud Quality Assessment without ReferenceCode0
PointPCA+: Extending PointPCA objective quality assessment metricCode0
Simple Baselines for Projection-based Full-reference and No-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment—0
Once-Training-All-Fine: No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Domain-relevance Degradation Description—0
GMS-3DQA: Projection-based Grid Mini-patch Sampling for 3D Model Quality AssessmentCode1
No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Weighted Patch Quality PredictionCode0
Reduced Reference Quality Assessment for Point Cloud Compression—0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 1 of 2Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1COPP-NetPLCC0.93—Unverified
2MM-PCQAPLCC0.83—Unverified
3NR-3DQAPLCC0.65—Unverified
4IT-PCQAPLCC0.55—Unverified
5ResSCNNPLCC0.43—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1-Pearson Correlation Coefficient 95.6—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1MM-PCQAKROCC0.78—Unverified