SOTAVerified

Natural Language Inference

Natural language inference (NLI) is the task of determining whether a "hypothesis" is true (entailment), false (contradiction), or undetermined (neutral) given a "premise".

Example:

| Premise | Label | Hypothesis | | --- | ---| --- | | A man inspects the uniform of a figure in some East Asian country. | contradiction | The man is sleeping. | | An older and younger man smiling. | neutral | Two men are smiling and laughing at the cats playing on the floor. | | A soccer game with multiple males playing. | entailment | Some men are playing a sport. |

Approaches used for NLI include earlier symbolic and statistical approaches to more recent deep learning approaches. Benchmark datasets used for NLI include SNLI, MultiNLI, SciTail, among others. You can get hands-on practice on the SNLI task by following this d2l.ai chapter.

Further readings:

Papers

Showing 181–190 of 1961 papers

TitleStatusHype
IITK at SemEval-2024 Task 2: Exploring the Capabilities of LLMs for Safe Biomedical Natural Language Inference for Clinical TrialsCode0
Investigating the Robustness of Modelling Decisions for Few-Shot Cross-Topic Stance Detection: A Preregistered StudyCode0
Forget NLI, Use a Dictionary: Zero-Shot Topic Classification for Low-Resource Languages with Application to LuxembourgishCode0
SEME at SemEval-2024 Task 2: Comparing Masked and Generative Language Models on Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trials—0
Evaluating Generative Language Models in Information Extraction as Subjective Question CorrectionCode0
Affective-NLI: Towards Accurate and Interpretable Personality Recognition in ConversationCode0
A Differentiable Integer Linear Programming Solver for Explanation-Based Natural Language Inference—0
On the Role of Summary Content Units in Text Summarization EvaluationCode0
Evaluating Large Language Models Using Contrast Sets: An Experimental Approach—0
Ukrainian Texts Classification: Exploration of Cross-lingual Knowledge Transfer Approaches—0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 19 of 197Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1UnitedSynT5 (3B)% Test Accuracy94.7—Unverified
2UnitedSynT5 (335M)% Test Accuracy93.5—Unverified
3EFL (Entailment as Few-shot Learner) + RoBERTa-large% Test Accuracy93.1—Unverified
4Neural Tree Indexers for Text Understanding% Test Accuracy93.1—Unverified
5RoBERTa-large + self-explaining layer% Test Accuracy92.3—Unverified
6RoBERTa-large+Self-Explaining% Test Accuracy92.3—Unverified
7CA-MTL% Test Accuracy92.1—Unverified
8SemBERT% Test Accuracy91.9—Unverified
9MT-DNN-SMARTLARGEv0% Test Accuracy91.7—Unverified
10MT-DNN-SMART_100%ofTrainingDataDev Accuracy91.6—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Vega v2 6B (KD-based prompt transfer)Accuracy96—Unverified
2PaLM 540B (fine-tuned)Accuracy95.7—Unverified
3Turing NLR v5 XXL 5.4B (fine-tuned)Accuracy94.1—Unverified
4ST-MoE-32B 269B (fine-tuned)Accuracy93.5—Unverified
5DeBERTa-1.5BAccuracy93.2—Unverified
6MUPPET Roberta LargeAccuracy92.8—Unverified
7DeBERTaV3largeAccuracy92.7—Unverified
8T5-XXL 11B (fine-tuned)Accuracy92.5—Unverified
9T5-XXL 11BAccuracy92.5—Unverified
10UL2 20B (fine-tuned)Accuracy92.1—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1UnitedSynT5 (3B)Matched92.6—Unverified
2Turing NLR v5 XXL 5.4B (fine-tuned)Matched92.6—Unverified
3T5-XXL 11B (fine-tuned)Matched92—Unverified
4T5Matched92—Unverified
5T5-11BMismatched91.7—Unverified
6T5-3BMatched91.4—Unverified
7ALBERTMatched91.3—Unverified
8Adv-RoBERTa ensembleMatched91.1—Unverified
9DeBERTa (large)Matched91.1—Unverified
10SMARTRoBERTaDev Matched91.1—Unverified