SOTAVerified

Legal Reasoning

Papers

Showing 51–92 of 92 papers

TitleStatusHype
Can ChatGPT Perform Reasoning Using the IRAC Method in Analyzing Legal Scenarios Like a Lawyer?Code0
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Legal Judgment PredictionCode1
DISC-LawLLM: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Intelligent Legal ServicesCode2
LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models—0
Large Language Models in Cryptocurrency Securities Cases: Can a GPT Model Meaningfully Assist Lawyers?—0
Exploring the psychology of LLMs' Moral and Legal Reasoning—0
One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial SupportCode0
Argumentation Schemes for Blockchain Deanonymization—0
Algorithmic Unfairness through the Lens of EU Non-Discrimination Law: Or Why the Law is not a Decision Tree—0
GPT-4 Technical ReportCode6
Zero-shot Transfer of Article-aware Legal Outcome Classification for European Court of Human Rights Cases—0
Law to Binary Tree -- An Formal Interpretation of Legal Natural Language—0
Legal Prompting: Teaching a Language Model to Think Like a Lawyer—0
Using Argumentation Schemes to Model Legal Reasoning—0
Law Informs Code: A Legal Informatics Approach to Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humans—0
LegalBench: Prototyping a Collaborative Benchmark for Legal Reasoning—0
An Argumentation-Based Legal Reasoning Approach for DL-Ontology—0
Non-Determinism and the Lawlessness of Machine Learning Code—0
Claim Extraction and Law Matching for COVID-19-related LegislationCode0
Searching for Legal Documents at Paragraph Level: Automating Label Generation and Use of an Extended Attention Mask for Boosting Neural Models of Semantic Similarity—0
Exploiting Domain-Specific Knowledge for Judgment Prediction Is No Panacea—0
New Algebraic Normative Theories for Ethical and Legal Reasoning in the LogiKEy Framework—0
AutoLAW: Augmented Legal Reasoning through Legal Precedent Prediction—0
Antitrust and Artificial Intelligence (AAI): Antitrust Vigilance Lifecycle and AI Legal Reasoning Autonomy—0
Legal Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (LSAOM): Assimilating Advances in Autonomous AI Legal Reasoning—0
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) Amid the Advent of Autonomous AI Legal Reasoning—0
The Next Era of American Law Amid the Advent of Autonomous AI Legal Reasoning—0
Deconstructing Legal Text_Object Oriented Design in Legal Adjudication—0
AI and Legal Argumentation: Aligning the Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning—0
Robustness and Overcoming Brittleness of AI-Enabled Legal Micro-Directives: The Role of Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning—0
An Impact Model of AI on the Principles of Justice: Encompassing the Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning—0
Multidimensionality of Legal Singularity: Parametric Analysis and the Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning—0
Authorized and Unauthorized Practices of Law: The Role of Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning—0
Turing Test and the Practice of Law: The Role of Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning—0
An Ontological AI-and-Law Framework for the Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning—0
Modelling Value-oriented Legal Reasoning in LogiKEy—0
Designing Normative Theories for Ethical and Legal Reasoning: LogiKEy Framework, Methodology, and Tool SupportCode0
Passing the Brazilian OAB Exam: data preparation and some experimentsCode0
Causality and Responsibility for Formal Verification and BeyondCode0
Proceedings First Workshop on Causal Reasoning for Embedded and safety-critical Systems Technologies—0
Automated Reasoning for Robot Ethics—0
Automated Reasoning in Deontic Logic—0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 2 of 2Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1GPT-4Balanced Accuracy82.9—Unverified
2GPT-3.5Balanced Accuracy60.9—Unverified
3Claude-1Balanced Accuracy58.1—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1GPT-4Balanced Accuracy59.2—Unverified