SOTAVerified

Dense Pixel Correspondence Estimation

Papers

Showing 11–17 of 17 papers

TitleStatusHype
PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost VolumeCode1
Optical Flow Estimation using a Spatial Pyramid NetworkCode1
Multi-Camera Multi-Person Association using Transformer-Based Dense Pixel Correspondence Estimation and Detection-Based Masking—0
DGC-Net: Dense Geometric Correspondence NetworkCode0
FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep NetworksCode0
Joint Recovery of Dense Correspondence and Cosegmentation in Two ImagesCode0
DeepMatching: Hierarchical Deformable Dense MatchingCode0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 2 of 2Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1SPyNetViewpoint I AEPE36.94—Unverified
2COTR +Interp.Viewpoint I AEPE7.98—Unverified
3COTRViewpoint I AEPE7.75—Unverified
4FlowNet2Viewpoint I AEPE5.99—Unverified
5DeepMatching*Viewpoint I AEPE5.84—Unverified
6PWC-NetViewpoint I AEPE4.43—Unverified
7DGC-Net aff+tps+homoViewpoint I AEPE1.55—Unverified
8RANSAC-DMP+Viewpoint I AEPE0.48—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1COTR +Interp.AEPE (rate=5)1.71—Unverified
2COTRAEPE (rate=3)1.66—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1COTR +Interp.Average End-Point Error2.62—Unverified
2COTRAverage End-Point Error1.28—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1COTR +Interp.Average End-Point Error6.12—Unverified
2COTRAverage End-Point Error2.26—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1SD+DINO (Zero-shot)Average [email protected]79.7—Unverified