SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 901–910 of 1746 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
Diffusion Denoised Smoothing for Certified and Adversarial Robust Out-Of-Distribution Detection	Mar 27, 2023	Adversarial RobustnessOut-of-Distribution Detection	CodeCode Available	0
CAT:Collaborative Adversarial Training	Mar 27, 2023	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
Verifying Properties of Tsetlin Machines	Mar 25, 2023	Adversarial RobustnessInterpretable Machine Learning	CodeCode Available	0
Enhancing Multiple Reliability Measures via Nuisance-extended Information Bottleneck	Mar 24, 2023	Adversarial RobustnessNovelty Detection	CodeCode Available	0
Improved Adversarial Training Through Adaptive Instance-wise Loss Smoothing	Mar 24, 2023	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
Optimization and Optimizers for Adversarial Robustness	Mar 23, 2023	Adversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0
Adversarial Robustness and Feature Impact Analysis for Driver Drowsiness Detection	Mar 23, 2023	Adversarial RobustnessHeart Rate Variability	—Unverified	0
Revisiting DeepFool: generalization and improvement	Mar 22, 2023	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0
Reliable and Efficient Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness for Deep Hashing-Based Retrieval	Mar 22, 2023	Adversarial RobustnessDeep Hashing	—Unverified	0
Out of Thin Air: Exploring Data-Free Adversarial Robustness Distillation	Mar 21, 2023	Adversarial RobustnessKnowledge Distillation	—Unverified	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 91 of 175Next →

All datasets AdvGLUE CIFAR-10 ImageNet ImageNet-A ImageNet-C Stylized ImageNet CIFAR-100

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.61	—	Unverified
2	ALBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.59	—	Unverified
3	T5 (single model)	Accuracy	0.57	—	Unverified
4	SMART_RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.54	—	Unverified
5	FreeLB (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
6	RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
7	InfoBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.46	—	Unverified
8	ELECTRA (single model)	Accuracy	0.42	—	Unverified
9	BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.34	—	Unverified
10	SMART_BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed classifier	Accuracy	95.23	—	Unverified
2	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10	Accuracy	92.26	—	Unverified
3	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5	Accuracy	91.88	—	Unverified
4	GLOT-DR	Accuracy	84.13	—	Unverified
5	TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18	Accuracy	81.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	77.4	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	76.9	—	Unverified
3	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.8	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	12.2	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.3	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	3.2	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	59.3	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	57.9	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	56.9	—	Unverified
4	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	48	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	13	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.4	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	8.3	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed Classifier	Clean Accuracy	85.21	—	Unverified
2	ResNet18/MART-ANCRA	Clean Accuracy	60.1	—	Unverified