SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 81–90 of 1746 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype	Score
Adversarial Robustness Against the Union of Multiple Perturbation Models	Sep 9, 2019	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial Robustness against Multiple and Single l_p-Threat Models via Quick Fine-Tuning of Robust Classifiers	May 26, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5
Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?	Nov 10, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial Machine Learning: Bayesian Perspectives	Mar 7, 2020	Adversarial RobustnessBIG-bench Machine Learning	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial Training of Self-supervised Monocular Depth Estimation against Physical-World Attacks	Jan 31, 2023	Adversarial RobustnessAutonomous Driving	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial vulnerability of powerful near out-of-distribution detection	Jan 18, 2022	Adversarial RobustnessOut-of-Distribution Detection	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Models	Nov 4, 2021	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5
Guardians of Image Quality: Benchmarking Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks on Image Quality Metrics	Aug 2, 2024	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Purification	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial Attacks on ML Defense Models Competition	Oct 15, 2021	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5
Adversarial Image Color Transformations in Explicit Color Filter Space	Nov 12, 2020	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1	5

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 9 of 175Next →

All datasets AdvGLUE CIFAR-10 ImageNet ImageNet-A ImageNet-C Stylized ImageNet CIFAR-100

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.61	—	Unverified
2	ALBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.59	—	Unverified
3	T5 (single model)	Accuracy	0.57	—	Unverified
4	SMART_RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.54	—	Unverified
5	FreeLB (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
6	RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
7	InfoBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.46	—	Unverified
8	ELECTRA (single model)	Accuracy	0.42	—	Unverified
9	BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.34	—	Unverified
10	SMART_BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed classifier	Accuracy	95.23	—	Unverified
2	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10	Accuracy	92.26	—	Unverified
3	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5	Accuracy	91.88	—	Unverified
4	GLOT-DR	Accuracy	84.13	—	Unverified
5	TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18	Accuracy	81.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	77.4	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	76.9	—	Unverified
3	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.8	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	12.2	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.3	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	3.2	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	59.3	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	57.9	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	56.9	—	Unverified
4	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	48	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	13	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.4	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	8.3	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed Classifier	Clean Accuracy	85.21	—	Unverified
2	ResNet18/MART-ANCRA	Clean Accuracy	60.1	—	Unverified