SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 881–890 of 1746 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype	Score
Improving Adversarial Robustness of Ensembles with Diversity Training	Jan 28, 2019	Adversarial RobustnessDiversity	—Unverified	0	0
A Simple Framework to Enhance the Adversarial Robustness of Deep Learning-based Intrusion Detection System	Dec 6, 2023	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0	0
A Simple Fine-tuning Is All You Need: Towards Robust Deep Learning Via Adversarial Fine-tuning	Dec 25, 2020	Adversarial RobustnessAll	—Unverified	0	0
SAT: Improving Adversarial Training via Curriculum-Based Loss Smoothing	Mar 18, 2020	Adversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0	0
Improving Adversarial Robustness to Sensitivity and Invariance Attacks with Deep Metric Learning	Nov 4, 2022	Adversarial RobustnessMetric Learning	—Unverified	0	0
ASAT: Adaptively Scaled Adversarial Training in Time Series	Aug 20, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessTime Series	—Unverified	0	0
A Robust Adversarial Ensemble with Causal (Feature Interaction) Interpretations for Image Classification	Dec 28, 2024	Adversarial Robustnesscounterfactual	—Unverified	0	0
Improving Adversarial Robustness via Attention and Adversarial Logit Pairing	Aug 23, 2019	Adversarial Robustness	—Unverified	0	0
Improving Adversarial Robustness via Unlabeled Out-of-Domain Data	Jun 15, 2020	Adversarial RobustnessData Augmentation	—Unverified	0	0
Test-Time Adaptation with Perturbation Consistency Learning	Apr 25, 2023	Adversarial RobustnessPseudo Label	—Unverified	0	0

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 89 of 175Next →

All datasets AdvGLUE CIFAR-10 ImageNet ImageNet-A ImageNet-C Stylized ImageNet CIFAR-100

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.61	—	Unverified
2	ALBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.59	—	Unverified
3	T5 (single model)	Accuracy	0.57	—	Unverified
4	SMART_RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.54	—	Unverified
5	FreeLB (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
6	RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
7	InfoBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.46	—	Unverified
8	ELECTRA (single model)	Accuracy	0.42	—	Unverified
9	BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.34	—	Unverified
10	SMART_BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed classifier	Accuracy	95.23	—	Unverified
2	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10	Accuracy	92.26	—	Unverified
3	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5	Accuracy	91.88	—	Unverified
4	GLOT-DR	Accuracy	84.13	—	Unverified
5	TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18	Accuracy	81.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	77.4	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	76.9	—	Unverified
3	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.8	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	12.2	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.3	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	3.2	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	59.3	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	57.9	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	56.9	—	Unverified
4	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	48	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	13	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.4	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	8.3	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed Classifier	Clean Accuracy	85.21	—	Unverified
2	ResNet18/MART-ANCRA	Clean Accuracy	60.1	—	Unverified