SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 71–80 of 1746 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype
Adversarial Contrastive Learning via Asymmetric InfoNCE	Jul 18, 2022	Adversarial RobustnessContrastive Learning	CodeCode Available	1
Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Models	Nov 4, 2021	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1
Adversarial Robustness in Graph Neural Networks: A Hamiltonian Approach	Oct 10, 2023	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1
Adversarial Robustness Limits via Scaling-Law and Human-Alignment Studies	Apr 14, 2024	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1
DRSM: De-Randomized Smoothing on Malware Classifier Providing Certified Robustness	Mar 20, 2023	Adversarial RobustnessMalware Detection	CodeCode Available	1
Adversarial Robustness of Representation Learning for Knowledge Graphs	Sep 30, 2022	Adversarial RobustnessData Poisoning	CodeCode Available	1
CausalAdv: Adversarial Robustness through the Lens of Causality	Jun 11, 2021	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1
Adversarial Robustness Comparison of Vision Transformer and MLP-Mixer to CNNs	Oct 6, 2021	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1
On the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Transformers	Mar 29, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1
Adversarial Attacks on ML Defense Models Competition	Oct 15, 2021	Adversarial AttackAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	1

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 8 of 175Next →

All datasets AdvGLUE CIFAR-10 ImageNet ImageNet-A ImageNet-C Stylized ImageNet CIFAR-100

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.61	—	Unverified
2	ALBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.59	—	Unverified
3	T5 (single model)	Accuracy	0.57	—	Unverified
4	SMART_RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.54	—	Unverified
5	FreeLB (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
6	RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
7	InfoBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.46	—	Unverified
8	ELECTRA (single model)	Accuracy	0.42	—	Unverified
9	BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.34	—	Unverified
10	SMART_BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed classifier	Accuracy	95.23	—	Unverified
2	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10	Accuracy	92.26	—	Unverified
3	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5	Accuracy	91.88	—	Unverified
4	GLOT-DR	Accuracy	84.13	—	Unverified
5	TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18	Accuracy	81.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	77.4	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	76.9	—	Unverified
3	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.8	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	12.2	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.3	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	3.2	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	59.3	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	57.9	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	56.9	—	Unverified
4	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	48	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	13	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.4	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	8.3	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed Classifier	Clean Accuracy	85.21	—	Unverified
2	ResNet18/MART-ANCRA	Clean Accuracy	60.1	—	Unverified