SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 16511675 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
Exposing Fine-Grained Adversarial Vulnerability of Face Anti-Spoofing Models0
Exposing the Robustness and Vulnerability of Hybrid 8T-6T SRAM Memory Architectures to Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networks0
AdvCat: Domain-Agnostic Robustness Assessment for Cybersecurity-Critical Applications with Categorical Inputs0
CARES: Comprehensive Evaluation of Safety and Adversarial Robustness in Medical LLMs0
Extreme Miscalibration and the Illusion of Adversarial Robustness0
F^2AT: Feature-Focusing Adversarial Training via Disentanglement of Natural and Perturbed Patterns0
Facial Attributes: Accuracy and Adversarial Robustness0
FADE: Enabling Federated Adversarial Training on Heterogeneous Resource-Constrained Edge Devices0
FADER: Fast Adversarial Example Rejection0
Failure Modes of Variational Autoencoders and Their Effects on Downstream Tasks0
Understanding Adversarial Robustness: The Trade-off between Minimum and Average Margin0
Sparse DNNs with Improved Adversarial Robustness0
Fair Robust Active Learning by Joint Inconsistency0
FAIR-TAT: Improving Model Fairness Using Targeted Adversarial Training0
Faithful Knowledge Distillation0
Spatial-Temporal-Fusion BNN: Variational Bayesian Feature Layer0
Understanding Adversarial Robustness Through Loss Landscape Geometries0
Fast Adversarial Training against Textual Adversarial Attacks0
Understanding and Measuring Robustness of Multimodal Learning0
Fast Adversarial Training with Weak-to-Strong Spatial-Temporal Consistency in the Frequency Domain on Videos0
Beyond cross-entropy: learning highly separable feature distributions for robust and accurate classification0
SpeechGuard: Exploring the Adversarial Robustness of Multimodal Large Language Models0
Beyond Classification: Evaluating Diffusion Denoised Smoothing for Security-Utility Trade off0
Better Representations via Adversarial Training in Pre-Training: A Theoretical Perspective0
FAT: Federated Adversarial Training0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 67 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified