SOTAVerified|Agents Browse Leaderboard About

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Recently Added Most Hyped Most Active Needs Verification Most Verified

Showing 621–630 of 1746 papers

Title	Date	Tasks	Status	Hype	Score
Approximate Manifold Defense Against Multiple Adversarial Perturbations	Apr 5, 2020	Adversarial Robustnessimage-classification	CodeCode Available	0	5
Improving Adversarial Robustness via Decoupled Visual Representation Masking	Jun 16, 2024	Adversarial DefenseAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0	5
Efficiently Training Low-Curvature Neural Networks	Jun 14, 2022	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0	5
Adversarial Concurrent Training: Optimizing Robustness and Accuracy Trade-off of Deep Neural Networks	Aug 16, 2020	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0	5
Give me a hint: Can LLMs take a hint to solve math problems?	Oct 8, 2024	Adversarial RobustnessMath	CodeCode Available	0	5
Assaying Out-Of-Distribution Generalization in Transfer Learning	Jul 19, 2022	Adversarial RobustnessOut-of-Distribution Generalization	CodeCode Available	0	5
Disentangling Adversarial Robustness in Directions of the Data Manifold	Jan 1, 2021	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0	5
Error Correcting Output Codes Improve Probability Estimation and Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks	Dec 1, 2019	Adversarial DefenseAdversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0	5
Error Diffusion Halftoning Against Adversarial Examples	Jan 23, 2021	Adversarial RobustnessQuantization	CodeCode Available	0	5
Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalization	Dec 3, 2018	Adversarial Robustness	CodeCode Available	0	5

Show:10 25 50

← PrevPage 63 of 175Next →

All datasets AdvGLUE CIFAR-10 ImageNet ImageNet-A ImageNet-C Stylized ImageNet CIFAR-100

Benchmark Results

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.61	—	Unverified
2	ALBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.59	—	Unverified
3	T5 (single model)	Accuracy	0.57	—	Unverified
4	SMART_RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.54	—	Unverified
5	FreeLB (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
6	RoBERTa (single model)	Accuracy	0.5	—	Unverified
7	InfoBERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.46	—	Unverified
8	ELECTRA (single model)	Accuracy	0.42	—	Unverified
9	BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.34	—	Unverified
10	SMART_BERT (single model)	Accuracy	0.3	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed classifier	Accuracy	95.23	—	Unverified
2	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10	Accuracy	92.26	—	Unverified
3	Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5	Accuracy	91.88	—	Unverified
4	GLOT-DR	Accuracy	84.13	—	Unverified
5	TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18	Accuracy	81.7	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	77.4	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	76.9	—	Unverified
3	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.8	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	76.4	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	12.2	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.3	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	3.2	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	3.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	59.3	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	57.9	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	56.9	—	Unverified
4	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	mean Corruption Error (mCE)	48	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	13	—	Unverified
2	ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.4	—	Unverified
3	ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)	Accuracy	8.3	—	Unverified
4	ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)	Accuracy	8.1	—	Unverified

#	Model	Metric	Claimed	Verified	Status
1	Mixed Classifier	Clean Accuracy	85.21	—	Unverified
2	ResNet18/MART-ANCRA	Clean Accuracy	60.1	—	Unverified