SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 126150 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
Adversarial Robustness Against the Union of Multiple Perturbation ModelsCode1
A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial RobustnessCode1
An Adaptive Orthogonal Convolution Scheme for Efficient and Flexible CNN ArchitecturesCode1
Adversarial Robustness for CodeCode1
A Light Recipe to Train Robust Vision TransformersCode1
A Perturbation-Constrained Adversarial Attack for Evaluating the Robustness of Optical FlowCode1
Adversarial Attacks on ML Defense Models CompetitionCode1
Adversarial Robustness Comparison of Vision Transformer and MLP-Mixer to CNNsCode1
AdvRush: Searching for Adversarially Robust Neural ArchitecturesCode1
Adversarial vulnerability of powerful near out-of-distribution detectionCode1
Adversarial Visual Robustness by Causal InterventionCode1
Adversarial Vulnerability of Randomized EnsemblesCode1
An Orthogonal Classifier for Improving the Adversarial Robustness of Neural NetworksCode1
A Pilot Study of Query-Free Adversarial Attack against Stable DiffusionCode1
ARAE: Adversarially Robust Training of Autoencoders Improves Novelty DetectionCode1
AGKD-BML: Defense Against Adversarial Attack by Attention Guided Knowledge Distillation and Bi-directional Metric LearningCode1
Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?Code1
Adversarial Training of Self-supervised Monocular Depth Estimation against Physical-World AttacksCode1
Adversarial Contrastive Learning via Asymmetric InfoNCECode1
Adversarial Robustness Limits via Scaling-Law and Human-Alignment StudiesCode1
A Unified Analysis of Mixed Sample Data Augmentation: A Loss Function PerspectiveCode1
Adversarial Robustness as a Prior for Learned RepresentationsCode1
Adversarial Robustness in Graph Neural Networks: A Hamiltonian ApproachCode1
Adversarial Robustness of Bottleneck Injected Deep Neural Networks for Task-Oriented CommunicationCode1
Adversarial Training with Complementary Labels: On the Benefit of Gradually Informative AttacksCode1
Show:102550
← PrevPage 6 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified