SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 14261450 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
End-to-end Kernel Learning via Generative Random Fourier FeaturesCode0
Second Order Optimization for Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability0
Dual Manifold Adversarial Robustness: Defense against Lp and non-Lp Adversarial Attacks0
Adversarially Robust Neural Architectures0
Perceptual Deep Neural Networks: Adversarial Robustness through Input Recreation0
Likelihood Landscapes: A Unifying Principle Behind Many Adversarial Defenses0
Rethinking Non-idealities in Memristive Crossbars for Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks0
Towards adversarial robustness with 01 loss neural networksCode0
Improving adversarial robustness of deep neural networks by using semantic information0
Adversarial Attack and Defense Strategies for Deep Speaker Recognition SystemsCode1
A Deep Dive into Adversarial Robustness in Zero-Shot LearningCode0
Adversarial Concurrent Training: Optimizing Robustness and Accuracy Trade-off of Deep Neural NetworksCode0
On the Generalization Properties of Adversarial Training0
Adversary Agnostic Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning0
Feature Binding with Category-Dependant MixUp for Semantic Segmentation and Adversarial Robustness0
Improve Generalization and Robustness of Neural Networks via Weight Scale Shifting Invariant Regularizations0
TREND: Transferability based Robust ENsemble DesignCode0
Adversarial Robustness for Machine Learning Cyber Defenses Using Log Data0
From Sound Representation to Model Robustness0
Robust Collective Classification against Structural Attacks0
Hierarchical Verification for Adversarial Robustness0
Neural Networks with Recurrent Generative FeedbackCode1
Certifiably Adversarially Robust Detection of Out-of-Distribution DataCode1
On Adversarial Robustness: A Neural Architecture Search perspectiveCode0
Failure Modes of Variational Autoencoders and Their Effects on Downstream Tasks0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 58 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified