SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 13261350 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
Robust Certification for Laplace Learning on Geometric Graphs0
Towards Adversarial Patch Analysis and Certified Defense against Crowd CountingCode0
Mixture of Robust Experts (MoRE):A Robust Denoising Method towards multiple perturbations0
Removing Adversarial Noise in Class Activation Feature Space0
Calibration and Consistency of Adversarial Surrogate Losses0
On the Sensitivity and Stability of Model Interpretations in NLPCode0
Does language help generalization in vision models?Code0
Improved Branch and Bound for Neural Network Verification via Lagrangian Decomposition0
Relating Adversarially Robust Generalization to Flat Minima0
Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Gaussian ProcessesCode0
Universal Adversarial Training with Class-Wise Perturbations0
Robust Adversarial Classification via Abstaining0
Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Speech Recognition Systems0
Class-Aware Robust Adversarial Training for Object Detection0
Learning Lipschitz Feedback Policies from Expert Demonstrations: Closed-Loop Guarantees, Generalization and Robustness0
Towards Understanding Adversarial Robustness of Optical Flow NetworksCode0
Ensemble-in-One: Learning Ensemble within Random Gated Networks for Enhanced Adversarial Robustness0
Constant Random Perturbations Provide Adversarial Robustness with Minimal Effect on AccuracyCode0
Reframing Neural Networks: Deep Structure in Overcomplete Representations0
Improving Global Adversarial Robustness Generalization With Adversarially Trained GAN0
Constrained Learning with Non-Convex Losses0
Improving Transformation-based Defenses against Adversarial Examples with First-order Perturbations0
Structure-Preserving Progressive Low-rank Image Completion for Defending Adversarial Attacks0
Shift Invariance Can Reduce Adversarial RobustnessCode0
Smoothness Analysis of Adversarial Training0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 54 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified