SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 12261250 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
Adversarial Training for Face Recognition Systems using Contrastive Adversarial Learning and Triplet Loss Fine-tuning0
Observations on K-image Expansion of Image-Mixing Augmentation for ClassificationCode0
Adversarial Robustness of Program Synthesis Models0
Improving Adversarial Robustness for Free with Snapshot Ensemble0
Adversarial Robustness Verification and Attack Synthesis in Stochastic SystemsCode0
Adversarial Robustness via Adaptive Label Smoothing0
Empirical Study of the Decision Region and Robustness in Deep Neural Networks0
An Empirical Study of Accuracy, Fairness, Explainability, Distributional Robustness, and Adversarial Robustness0
Efficient Certification for Probabilistic Robustness0
Function-Space Variational Inference for Deep Bayesian Classification0
GARNET: A Spectral Approach to Robust and Scalable Graph Neural Networks0
Provably Robust Transfer0
Does Adversarial Robustness Really Imply Backdoor Vulnerability?0
Dissecting Local Properties of Adversarial Examples0
Delving into Feature Space: Improving Adversarial Robustness by Feature Spectral Regularization0
Use of small auxiliary networks and scarce data to improve the adversarial robustness of deep learning models0
Resilience to Multiple Attacks via Adversarially Trained MIMO Ensembles0
Certified Adversarial Robustness Under the Bounded Support Set0
Learning Sample Reweighting for Adversarial Robustness0
Towards Achieving Adversarial Robustness Beyond Perceptual Limits0
k-Mixup Regularization for Deep Learning via Optimal Transport0
Biased Multi-Domain Adversarial Training0
Two Souls in an Adversarial Image: Towards Universal Adversarial Example Detection using Multi-view InconsistencyCode0
CC-Cert: A Probabilistic Approach to Certify General Robustness of Neural NetworksCode0
Robust Physical-World Attacks on Face Recognition0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 50 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified