SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 11511175 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
Vulnerabilities in AI-generated Image Detection: The Challenge of Adversarial Attacks0
Wavelets Beat Monkeys at Adversarial Robustness0
Fundamental Limits in Formal Verification of Message-Passing Neural Networks0
What are effective labels for augmented data? Improving robustness with AutoLabel0
When is dataset cartography ineffective? Using training dynamics does not improve robustness against Adversarial SQuAD0
Who's Afraid of Thomas Bayes?0
With Great Backbones Comes Great Adversarial Transferability0
XploreNAS: Explore Adversarially Robust & Hardware-efficient Neural Architectures for Non-ideal Xbars0
Your Classifier Can Do More: Towards Bridging the Gaps in Classification, Robustness, and Generation0
Extreme Miscalibration and the Illusion of Adversarial Robustness0
F^2AT: Feature-Focusing Adversarial Training via Disentanglement of Natural and Perturbed Patterns0
Facial Attributes: Accuracy and Adversarial Robustness0
FADE: Enabling Federated Adversarial Training on Heterogeneous Resource-Constrained Edge Devices0
FADER: Fast Adversarial Example Rejection0
Failure Modes of Variational Autoencoders and Their Effects on Downstream Tasks0
Fair Robust Active Learning by Joint Inconsistency0
FAIR-TAT: Improving Model Fairness Using Targeted Adversarial Training0
Faithful Knowledge Distillation0
Fast Adversarial Training against Textual Adversarial Attacks0
Fast Adversarial Training with Weak-to-Strong Spatial-Temporal Consistency in the Frequency Domain on Videos0
FAT: Federated Adversarial Training0
Fault Tolerance of Neural Networks in Adversarial Settings0
Feature Averaging: An Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent Leading to Non-Robustness in Neural Networks0
Feature Binding with Category-Dependant MixUp for Semantic Segmentation and Adversarial Robustness0
Feature Distillation With Guided Adversarial Contrastive Learning0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 47 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified