SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 11261150 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
Adversarial Robustness via Adaptive Label Smoothing0
Efficient Certification for Probabilistic Robustness0
Learning Sample Reweighting for Adversarial Robustness0
Towards Achieving Adversarial Robustness Beyond Perceptual Limits0
Resilience to Multiple Attacks via Adversarially Trained MIMO Ensembles0
An Empirical Study of Accuracy, Fairness, Explainability, Distributional Robustness, and Adversarial Robustness0
Two Souls in an Adversarial Image: Towards Universal Adversarial Example Detection using Multi-view InconsistencyCode0
CC-Cert: A Probabilistic Approach to Certify General Robustness of Neural NetworksCode0
Robust Physical-World Attacks on Face Recognition0
Simple Post-Training Robustness Using Test Time Augmentations and Random ForestCode0
Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Math Word Problem SolversCode0
How to Select One Among All? An Extensive Empirical Study Towards the Robustness of Knowledge Distillation in Natural Language UnderstandingCode1
Adversarial Bone Length Attack on Action Recognition0
RobustART: Benchmarking Robustness on Architecture Design and Training TechniquesCode1
2-in-1 Accelerator: Enabling Random Precision Switch for Winning Both Adversarial Robustness and Efficiency0
Utilizing Adversarial Targeted Attacks to Boost Adversarial Robustness0
Impact of Attention on Adversarial Robustness of Image Classification Models0
Adversarial Robustness for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation0
Sample Efficient Detection and Classification of Adversarial Attacks via Self-Supervised Embeddings0
Understanding the Logit Distributions of Adversarially-Trained Deep Neural Networks0
A Hierarchical Assessment of Adversarial SeverityCode0
Generalized Real-World Super-Resolution through Adversarial RobustnessCode1
Adversarially Robust One-class Novelty DetectionCode0
Bridged Adversarial Training0
Are socially-aware trajectory prediction models really socially-aware?Code1
Show:102550
← PrevPage 46 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified