SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 76–100 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
Adversarial Visual Robustness by Causal InterventionCode1
Adversarial Vulnerability of Randomized EnsemblesCode1
AdvRush: Searching for Adversarially Robust Neural ArchitecturesCode1
On the Adversarial Robustness of Vision TransformersCode1
Adversarial Image Color Transformations in Explicit Color Filter SpaceCode1
DRSM: De-Randomized Smoothing on Malware Classifier Providing Certified RobustnessCode1
A Perturbation-Constrained Adversarial Attack for Evaluating the Robustness of Optical FlowCode1
Adversarial Robustness in Graph Neural Networks: A Hamiltonian ApproachCode1
A Regularization Method to Improve Adversarial Robustness of Neural Networks for ECG Signal ClassificationCode1
Adversarial Pruning: A Survey and Benchmark of Pruning Methods for Adversarial RobustnessCode1
Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language ModelsCode1
Adversarial Robustness Limits via Scaling-Law and Human-Alignment StudiesCode1
Guardians of Image Quality: Benchmarking Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks on Image Quality MetricsCode1
Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning StrongerCode1
Adversarial Robustness of Representation Learning for Knowledge GraphsCode1
Adversarially-Aware Robust Object DetectorCode1
Adversarial Robustification via Text-to-Image Diffusion ModelsCode1
Adversarial Attacks on ML Defense Models CompetitionCode1
BadPart: Unified Black-box Adversarial Patch Attacks against Pixel-wise Regression TasksCode1
Adversarially Robust DistillationCode1
Adversarial Robustness Against the Union of Multiple Perturbation ModelsCode1
Adversarial Robustness Comparison of Vision Transformer and MLP-Mixer to CNNsCode1
Bridging Mode Connectivity in Loss Landscapes and Adversarial RobustnessCode1
CARBEN: Composite Adversarial Robustness BenchmarkCode1
Adversarial Robustness against Multiple and Single l_p-Threat Models via Quick Fine-Tuning of Robust ClassifiersCode1
Show:102550
← PrevPage 4 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61—Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59—Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57—Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54—Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5—Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5—Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46—Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42—Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34—Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23—Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26—Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88—Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13—Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4—Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9—Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8—Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2—Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3—Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2—Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3—Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9—Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9—Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13—Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4—Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3—Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1—Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21—Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1—Unverified