SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 951975 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
RobustBlack: Challenging Black-Box Adversarial Attacks on State-of-the-Art Defenses0
Robust Certification for Laplace Learning on Geometric Graphs0
Robust Collective Classification against Structural Attacks0
Robust Dataset Distillation by Matching Adversarial Trajectories0
Adversarial Robustness through Bias Variance Decomposition: A New Perspective for Federated Learning0
Robust Decentralized Learning with Local Updates and Gradient Tracking0
Robust Deep Learning Ensemble against Deception0
Robust Distillation via Untargeted and Targeted Intermediate Adversarial Samples0
RobustEdge: Low Power Adversarial Detection for Cloud-Edge Systems0
Robust Ensemble Model Training via Random Layer Sampling Against Adversarial Attack0
Robust Explainability: A Tutorial on Gradient-Based Attribution Methods for Deep Neural Networks0
Robustified Domain Adaptation0
Robust Information Retrieval0
Robust Linear Regression: Phase-Transitions and Precise Tradeoffs for General Norms0
Robust low-rank training via approximate orthonormal constraints0
RobustMQ: Benchmarking Robustness of Quantized Models0
Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Driven by Correlated Equilibrium0
Robustness Against Adversarial Attacks via Learning Confined Adversarial Polytopes0
Robustness Certificates for Implicit Neural Networks: A Mixed Monotone Contractive Approach0
Robustness-Congruent Adversarial Training for Secure Machine Learning Model Updates0
Robustness Implies Privacy in Statistical Estimation0
A Systematic Review of Robustness in Deep Learning for Computer Vision: Mind the gap?0
Robustness May Be at Odds with Fairness: An Empirical Study on Class-wise Accuracy0
Robustness of deep learning classification to adversarial input on GPUs: asynchronous parallel accumulation is a source of vulnerability0
Robustness of Explanation Methods for NLP Models0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 39 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified