SOTAVerified

Adversarial Robustness

Adversarial Robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of machine learning models under various types of adversarial attacks.

Papers

Showing 901925 of 1746 papers

TitleStatusHype
Provable Defense Against Clustering Attacks on 3D Point Clouds0
Provable Unrestricted Adversarial Training without Compromise with Generalizability0
Provably Robust Transfer0
Push-Pull: Characterizing the Adversarial Robustness for Audio-Visual Active Speaker Detection0
Q-TART: Quickly Training for Adversarial Robustness and in-Transferability0
QUANOS- Adversarial Noise Sensitivity Driven Hybrid Quantization of Neural Networks0
Quantifying Adversarial Sensitivity of a Model as a Function of the Image Distribution0
Quantitative Analysis of Deeply Quantized Tiny Neural Networks Robust to Adversarial Attacks0
Quantum Neural Networks under Depolarization Noise: Exploring White-Box Attacks and Defenses0
Quantum Support Vector Regression for Robust Anomaly Detection0
Query complexity of adversarial attacks0
Raising the Bar for Certified Adversarial Robustness with Diffusion Models0
Random Entangled Tokens for Adversarially Robust Vision Transformer0
Randomness in ML Defenses Helps Persistent Attackers and Hinders Evaluators0
Random Projections for Improved Adversarial Robustness0
Rapid Response: Mitigating LLM Jailbreaks with a Few Examples0
RBFormer: Improve Adversarial Robustness of Transformer by Robust Bias0
Achieving More Human Brain-Like Vision via Human EEG Representational Alignment0
Reassessing Noise Augmentation Methods in the Context of Adversarial Speech0
RECAST: Interactive Auditing of Automatic Toxicity Detection Models0
Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustness0
Recent Advances in Understanding Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks0
Recommender Systems for Democracy: Toward Adversarial Robustness in Voting Advice Applications0
Rectifying Adversarial Sample with Low Entropy Prior for Test-Time Defense0
Reframing Neural Networks: Deep Structure in Overcomplete Representations0
Show:102550
← PrevPage 37 of 70Next →

Benchmark Results

#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.61Unverified
2ALBERT (single model)Accuracy0.59Unverified
3T5 (single model)Accuracy0.57Unverified
4SMART_RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.54Unverified
5FreeLB (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
6RoBERTa (single model)Accuracy0.5Unverified
7InfoBERT (single model)Accuracy0.46Unverified
8ELECTRA (single model)Accuracy0.42Unverified
9BERT (single model)Accuracy0.34Unverified
10SMART_BERT (single model)Accuracy0.3Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed classifierAccuracy95.23Unverified
2Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-10Accuracy92.26Unverified
3Stochastic-LWTA/PGD/WideResNet-34-5Accuracy91.88Unverified
4GLOT-DRAccuracy84.13Unverified
5TRADES-ANCRA/ResNet18Accuracy81.7Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy77.4Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy76.9Unverified
3DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.8Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy76.4Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy12.2Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy3.3Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy3.2Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy3.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)59.3Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)mean Corruption Error (mCE)57.9Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)56.9Unverified
4DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)mean Corruption Error (mCE)48Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1DeiT-S (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy13Unverified
2ResNet-50 (SGD, Cosine)Accuracy8.4Unverified
3ResNet-50 (SGD, Step)Accuracy8.3Unverified
4ResNet-50 (AdamW, Cosine)Accuracy8.1Unverified
#ModelMetricClaimedVerifiedStatus
1Mixed ClassifierClean Accuracy85.21Unverified
2ResNet18/MART-ANCRAClean Accuracy60.1Unverified